OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910)vsEPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Management
See exactly how OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910) controls map to EPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Management. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910) maps to EPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Management with 4% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 161 OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910) controls identifies 193 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Subpart Z: Toxic and Hazardous Substances – OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 161 controls analysed | 849 frameworks | 314K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 314K+ mappings across 849 frameworks.
Subpart H: Hazardous Materials – OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910)(4 mappings)
Subpart Z: Toxic and Hazardous Substances – OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910)(1 mappings)
Subpart L: Fire Protection – OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910)(4 mappings)
Subpart E: Exit Routes and Emergency Planning – OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910)(3 mappings)
A OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910) to EPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Management crosswalk, built to order
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which EPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Management controls your existing OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910) work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 4% in the header counts how many OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910) controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many EPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Management controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910) comparisons
Other EPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Management comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
Cross-framework mappings across 849 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 849 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (314K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910) and EPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Management?
OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910) has 161 controls across its framework, while EPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Management covers 185 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (4% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Subpart Z: Toxic and Hazardous Substances – OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910), where 26 OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910) controls have no direct EPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Management equivalent.
How many controls map between OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910) and EPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Management?
Of 161 total OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910) controls, 7 map directly to EPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Management controls, representing 4% coverage. The remaining 193 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910) to EPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Management?
193 OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910) controls have no direct equivalent in EPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Management. The highest concentration of gaps is in Subpart Z: Toxic and Hazardous Substances – OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910) with 26 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910) and EPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Management?
The domain with the highest gap count is Subpart Z: Toxic and Hazardous Substances – OSHA General Industry Standards (29 CFR Part 1910) (26 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.