Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 14001:2015vsEPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Management

See exactly how ISO 14001:2015 controls map to EPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Management. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

26
Controls Mapped
6
Gaps Found
31%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 14001:2015 maps to EPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Management with 31% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 ISO 14001:2015 controls identifies 37 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Support – ISO 14001:2015.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 849 frameworks | 314K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 26 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 314K+ mappings across 849 frameworks.

Improvement – ISO 14001:2015(3 mappings)

iso-14001-2015::10.2Nonconformity and corrective action3 targets
→epa-rcra-hazardous-waste-management::264.100§ 264.100 Corrective action program
→epa-rcra-hazardous-waste-management::264.101§ 264.101 Corrective action for solid waste management units
→epa-rcra-hazardous-waste-management::264.196§ 264.196 Response to leaks or spills and disposition of leaking or unfit-for-use tank systems

Planning – ISO 14001:2015(4 mappings)

iso-14001-2015::6.1.3Compliance obligations3 targets
→epa-rcra-hazardous-waste-management::262.11§ 262.11 Hazardous waste determination and recordkeeping
→epa-rcra-hazardous-waste-management::262.13§ 262.13 Generator category determination
→epa-rcra-hazardous-waste-management::268.9§ 268.9 Special rules regarding wastes that exhibit a characteristic
iso-14001-2015::6.2.1Environmental objectives
→epa-rcra-hazardous-waste-management::262.27§ 262.27 Waste minimization certification

Support – ISO 14001:2015(10 mappings)

iso-14001-2015::7.2Competence3 targets
→epa-rcra-hazardous-waste-management::262.207§ 262.207 Training
→epa-rcra-hazardous-waste-management::264.16§ 264.16 Personnel training
→epa-rcra-hazardous-waste-management::273.36§ 273.36 Employee training (large quantity handlers)
iso-14001-2015::7.4.3External communication2 targets
→epa-rcra-hazardous-waste-management::262.41§ 262.41 Biennial report for large quantity generators
→epa-rcra-hazardous-waste-management::262.42§ 262.42 Exception reporting
iso-14001-2015::7.5.1General2 targets
→epa-rcra-hazardous-waste-management::264.73§ 264.73 Operating record
→epa-rcra-hazardous-waste-management::273.39§ 273.39 Tracking universal waste shipments (large quantity handlers)
iso-14001-2015::7.5.3Control of documented information3 targets
→epa-rcra-hazardous-waste-management::262.40§ 262.40 Recordkeeping
→epa-rcra-hazardous-waste-management::263.22§ 263.22 Recordkeeping
→epa-rcra-hazardous-waste-management::264.74§ 264.74 Availability, retention, and disposition of records

Operation – ISO 14001:2015(3 mappings)

iso-14001-2015::8.1Operational planning and control3 targets
→epa-rcra-hazardous-waste-management::262.15§ 262.15 Satellite accumulation area regulations for small and large quantity generators
→epa-rcra-hazardous-waste-management::262.16§ 262.16 Conditions for exemption for a small quantity generator that accumulates hazardous waste
→epa-rcra-hazardous-waste-management::262.17§ 262.17 Conditions for exemption for a large quantity generator that accumulates hazardous waste

+6 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 849 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

A ISO 14001:2015 to EPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Management crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which EPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Management controls your existing ISO 14001:2015 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

ISO 14001:2015 into EPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Management
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

EPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Management into ISO 14001:2015
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

ISO 14001:2015 to EPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Management (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 31% in the header counts how many ISO 14001:2015 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many EPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Management controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 849 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 849 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (314K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 14001:2015 and EPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Management?

ISO 14001:2015 has 32 controls across its framework, while EPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Management covers 185 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (31% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Support – ISO 14001:2015, where 7 ISO 14001:2015 controls have no direct EPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Management equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 14001:2015 and EPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Management?

Of 32 total ISO 14001:2015 controls, 10 map directly to EPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Management controls, representing 31% coverage. The remaining 37 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 14001:2015 to EPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Management?

37 ISO 14001:2015 controls have no direct equivalent in EPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Management. The highest concentration of gaps is in Support – ISO 14001:2015 with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 14001:2015 and EPA RCRA Hazardous Waste Management?

The domain with the highest gap count is Support – ISO 14001:2015 (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.