OECD AI PrinciplesvsSASB Standards
See exactly how OECD AI Principles controls map to SASB Standards. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
OECD AI Principles maps to SASB Standards with 17% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 46 OECD AI Principles controls identifies 38 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Recommendations to Policymakers.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 46 controls analysed | 730 frameworks | 503K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 503K+ mappings across 730 frameworks.
OECD AI Principles: AI Risk Management(10 mappings)
Values-Based Principles(3 mappings)
OECD AI Principles: AI Data Governance(2 mappings)
OECD AI Principles: AI Accountability & Oversight(1 mappings)
OECD AI Principles: AI Safety & Security(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other OECD AI Principles comparisons
Other SASB Standards comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 730 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 730 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (503K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between OECD AI Principles and SASB Standards?
OECD AI Principles has 46 controls across its framework, while SASB Standards covers 43 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (17% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Recommendations to Policymakers, where 5 OECD AI Principles controls have no direct SASB Standards equivalent.
How many controls map between OECD AI Principles and SASB Standards?
Of 46 total OECD AI Principles controls, 8 map directly to SASB Standards controls — representing 17% coverage. The remaining 38 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping OECD AI Principles to SASB Standards?
38 OECD AI Principles controls have no direct equivalent in SASB Standards. The highest concentration of gaps is in Recommendations to Policymakers with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between OECD AI Principles and SASB Standards?
The domain with the highest gap count is Recommendations to Policymakers (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.