Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Privacy Framework 1.0vsSASB Standards

See exactly how NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 controls map to SASB Standards. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
81
Gaps Found
9%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 maps to SASB Standards with 9% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 100 NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 controls identifies 91 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Protect-P: Data Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 100 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Implementation and Use(5 mappings)

NIST-PF-IU-02CSF Alignment3 targets
SASB-LG-2Systemic Risk Management
SASB-LG-3Critical Incident Risk Management
SASB-LG-5Systemic Risk Management
NIST-PF-IU-03Stakeholder Engagement2 targets
SASB-BMI-3Supply Chain Management
SASB-LG-1Business Ethics

Privacy Core Functions(5 mappings)

NIST-PF-PCF-01Identify-P and Govern-P3 targets
SASB-LG-2Systemic Risk Management
SASB-LG-3Critical Incident Risk Management
SASB-LG-5Systemic Risk Management
NIST-PF-PCF-02Control-P and Communicate-P2 targets
SASB-SC-1Customer Privacy and Data Security
SASB-SOC-2Customer Privacy

Communicate-P: Data Processing Awareness(2 mappings)

PF-CM.PO-P2Privacy Notice Framework2 targets
SASB-SC-1Customer Privacy and Data Security
SASB-SOC-2Customer Privacy

Control-P: Data Processing Management(2 mappings)

PF-CT.DM-P8Audit/Log Records Maintained2 targets
SASB-SC-1Customer Privacy and Data Security
SASB-SOC-2Customer Privacy

Govern-P: Governance and Risk Management(3 mappings)

PF-GV.RM-P2Risk Tolerance Established3 targets
SASB-LG-2Systemic Risk Management
SASB-LG-3Critical Incident Risk Management
SASB-LG-5Systemic Risk Management

Protect-P: Data Protection(2 mappings)

PF-PR.DS-P4Adequate Capacity Maintained
SASB-BMI-2Business Model Resilience
PF-PR.PO-P2Configuration Change Control
SASB-BMI-5Physical Impacts of Climate Change

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 and SASB Standards?

NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 has 100 controls across its framework, while SASB Standards covers 23 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (9% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Protect-P: Data Protection, where 22 NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 controls have no direct SASB Standards equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 and SASB Standards?

Of 100 total NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 controls, 9 map directly to SASB Standards controls — representing 9% coverage. The remaining 91 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 to SASB Standards?

91 NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 controls have no direct equivalent in SASB Standards. The highest concentration of gaps is in Protect-P: Data Protection with 22 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Privacy Framework 1.0 and SASB Standards?

The domain with the highest gap count is Protect-P: Data Protection (22 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.