TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11)vsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)

See exactly how O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) controls map to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
62%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) maps to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) with 62% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 13 O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security Protocols (O-RAN.WG11 Pillar 3).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 13 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Security Threat Modeling (O-RAN.WG11 Pillar 1)(4 mappings)

ORAN-SEC-1.1Threat Modeling and Remediation3 targets
→AESCSF-TVM-2Threat Intelligence
→CSA-TVM-01Vulnerability Management
→CSA-TVM-02Penetration Testing
ORAN-SEC-1.2Risk Management
→AESCSF-TVM-2Threat Intelligence

Security Requirements (O-RAN.WG11 Pillar 2 - O-R003)(5 mappings)

ORAN-SEC-2.1Interface Security Requirements3 targets
→CSA-INF-01Identity and Access Management
→CSA-INF-04Incident Management
→CSA-INF-05Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
ORAN-SEC-2.3Least Privilege and Zero Trust2 targets
→CSA-INF-01Identity and Access Management
→CSA-INF-02Infrastructure and Virtualization Security

Security Protocols (O-RAN.WG11 Pillar 3)(3 mappings)

ORAN-SEC-3.1TLS Implementation3 targets
→CSA-DATA-02Encryption and Key Management
→CSA-INF-04Incident Management
→CSA-INF-05Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery

Security Testing (O-RAN.WG11 Pillar 4)(3 mappings)

ORAN-SEC-4.1Security Test Specifications2 targets
→CSA-INF-04Incident Management
→CSA-INF-05Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
ORAN-SEC-4.2Security Log Management
→CSA-INF-03Security Monitoring and Logging

Data and Application Security(1 mappings)

ORAN-SEC-5.2Application Security
→CSA-TVM-03Application Security (DevSecOps)

Related Comparisons

Other O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) comparisons

O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) vs CSA CCM v49 mappingsO-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)9 mappingsO-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange9 mappingsO-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) vs ISO 27001:20228 mappingsO-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)8 mappingsO-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.08 mappingsO-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) vs Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)8 mappingsO-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)8 mappings

Other CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) comparisons

CSA CCM v4 vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)14 mappingsSingapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)14 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)13 mappingsOman National Cybersecurity Framework vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)13 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)13 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)13 mappingsBIMCO Cyber Security vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)12 mappingsCAIQ (CSA) vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)12 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) has 13 controls across its framework, while CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) covers 15 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security Protocols (O-RAN.WG11 Pillar 3), where 2 O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) controls have no direct CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) equivalent.

How many controls map between O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

Of 13 total O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) controls, 8 map directly to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) to CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

5 O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) controls have no direct equivalent in CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk). The highest concentration of gaps is in Security Protocols (O-RAN.WG11 Pillar 3) with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) and CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security Protocols (O-RAN.WG11 Pillar 3) (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.