TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information SystemsvsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
3
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 50% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Impact-Aligned Recovery + RMF Integration.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Contingency Planning Policy and Programme(1 mappings)

NISTSP34-1Contingency Planning Policy, Programme, and Plan Coordination
→3.3Configure Data Access Control Lists

Business Impact Analysis(2 mappings)

NISTSP34-2Business Impact Analysis (BIA): Critical Resources, Recovery Priorities2 targets
→3.3Configure Data Access Control Lists
→3.6Encrypt Data on End-User Devices

ISCP Development(1 mappings)

NISTSP34-4Information System Contingency Plan (ISCP) Development
→3.6Encrypt Data on End-User Devices

Testing, Training, Exercises(1 mappings)

NISTSP34-5Plan Testing, Training, and Exercises (TTE)
→3.1Physical Security

Related Comparisons

Other NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems comparisons

NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)4 mappingsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs OWASP ASVS4 mappingsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs Azure Security Benchmark4 mappingsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar4 mappingsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs ISO/IEC 27011:20244 mappingsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs FedRAMP Rev 54 mappingsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs GLBA4 mappingsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)4 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements18 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements17 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements16 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems has 8 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Impact-Aligned Recovery + RMF Integration, where 1 NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 8 total NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems controls, 4 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

4 NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Impact-Aligned Recovery + RMF Integration with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Impact-Aligned Recovery + RMF Integration (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.