Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-53A Rev. 5vsFedRAMP High

See exactly how NIST SP 800-53A Rev. 5 controls map to FedRAMP High. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
11
Gaps Found
47%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-53A Rev. 5 maps to FedRAMP High with 47% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 30 NIST SP 800-53A Rev. 5 controls identifies 16 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Chapter Three: The Assessment Process.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 30 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Chapter Two: The Fundamentals(1 mappings)

53A-2.1Assessments Within the System Development Life Cycle
SA-11Developer Testing and Evaluation

Chapter Three: The Assessment Process(10 mappings)

53A-3.1Prepare for Control Assessments2 targets
CA-2(1)Independent Assessors
CA-7(1)Independent Assessment
53A-3.2.2Select Procedures to Assess the Controls
CA-2Control Assessments
53A-3.2.3.5Reuse of Assessment Evidence
CA-2(3)Control Assessments | Leveraging Results from External Organizations. Leverage the results of control assessments performed by [Assignment: organization-defined external organization] on [Assignment: organization-defined system] when the assessment meets [Assignment: organization-defined requirements]
53A-3.2.3.6External System Considerations
CA-2(3)Control Assessments | Leveraging Results from External Organizations. Leverage the results of control assessments performed by [Assignment: organization-defined external organization] on [Assignment: organization-defined system] when the assessment meets [Assignment: organization-defined requirements]
53A-3.2.6Finalize the Assessment Plan and Obtain Approval2 targets
CA-1Policy and Procedures
CA-2Control Assessments
53A-3.3Conduct Control Assessments
CA-2Control Assessments
53A-3.4Analyze Assessment Report Results2 targets
CA-5Plan of Action and Milestones
CA-7(4)Continuous Monitoring | Risk Monitoring. Ensure risk monitoring is an integral part of the continuous monitoring strategy that includes the following: (a) Effectiveness monitoring; (b) Compliance monitoring; and (c) Change monitoring

Appendix C: Assessment Methods and Attributes(3 mappings)

53A-C-COVERAGEAssessment Attribute: Coverage
RA-5(3)Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning | Breadth and Depth of Coverage. Define the breadth and depth of vulnerability scanning coverage
53A-C-DEPTHAssessment Attribute: Depth
RA-5(3)Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning | Breadth and Depth of Coverage. Define the breadth and depth of vulnerability scanning coverage
53A-C-TESTAssessment Method: Test
SI-6Security and Privacy Function Verification. a. Verify the correct operation of [Assignment: organization-defined security and privacy functions]; b. Perform the verification of the functions specified in SI-6a [Selection (one or more): [Assignment: organization-defined system

Appendices D to F: Penetration Testing, Reporting and Ongoing Assessment(5 mappings)

53A-DPenetration Testing3 targets
CA-8Penetration Testing
CA-8(1)Penetration Testing | Independent Penetration Testing Agent or Team. Employ an independent penetration testing agent or team to perform penetration testing on the system or system components
CA-8(2)Penetration Testing | Red Team Exercises. Employ the following red-team exercises to simulate attempts by adversaries to compromise organizational systems in accordance with applicable rules of engagement: [Assignment: organization-defined red team exercises]
53A-EAssessment Reports
CA-6Authorization
53A-FOngoing Assessment and Automation
CA-7Continuous Monitoring
Coverage crosswalk

A NIST SP 800-53A Rev. 5 to FedRAMP High crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which FedRAMP High controls your existing NIST SP 800-53A Rev. 5 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

NIST SP 800-53A Rev. 5 into FedRAMP High
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

FedRAMP High into NIST SP 800-53A Rev. 5
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST SP 800-53A Rev. 5 to FedRAMP High (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 47% in the header counts how many NIST SP 800-53A Rev. 5 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many FedRAMP High controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-53A Rev. 5 and FedRAMP High?

NIST SP 800-53A Rev. 5 has 30 controls across its framework, while FedRAMP High covers 410 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (47% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter Three: The Assessment Process, where 9 NIST SP 800-53A Rev. 5 controls have no direct FedRAMP High equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-53A Rev. 5 and FedRAMP High?

Of 30 total NIST SP 800-53A Rev. 5 controls, 14 map directly to FedRAMP High controls, representing 47% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-53A Rev. 5 to FedRAMP High?

16 NIST SP 800-53A Rev. 5 controls have no direct equivalent in FedRAMP High. The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter Three: The Assessment Process with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-53A Rev. 5 and FedRAMP High?

The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter Three: The Assessment Process (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.