Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5vsNSA Guidance for Transition to Quantum-Resistant Cryptography

See exactly how NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls map to NSA Guidance for Transition to Quantum-Resistant Cryptography. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
182
Gaps Found
2%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 maps to NSA Guidance for Transition to Quantum-Resistant Cryptography with 2% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 192 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls identifies 188 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in AC - Access Control.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 192 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

IA - Identification and Authentication(3 mappings)

NIST800-IA-7Cryptographic module authentication3 targets
QRCM-1.2Quantum-Vulnerable Identification
QRCM-3.1Hybrid Solution Deployment (2025-2030)
QRCM-4.2TLS 1.3 Adoption

RA - Risk Assessment(1 mappings)

NIST800-RA-2Security categorization
QRCM-1.3Data Classification for Migration

SC - System and Communications Protection(6 mappings)

NIST800-SC-12Cryptographic key establishment and management3 targets
QRCM-1.2Quantum-Vulnerable Identification
QRCM-3.1Hybrid Solution Deployment (2025-2030)
QRCM-4.2TLS 1.3 Adoption
NIST800-SC-13Cryptographic protection3 targets
QRCM-1.2Quantum-Vulnerable Identification
QRCM-3.1Hybrid Solution Deployment (2025-2030)
QRCM-4.2TLS 1.3 Adoption

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and NSA Guidance for Transition to Quantum-Resistant Cryptography?

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 has 192 controls across its framework, while NSA Guidance for Transition to Quantum-Resistant Cryptography covers 29 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (2% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AC - Access Control, where 15 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls have no direct NSA Guidance for Transition to Quantum-Resistant Cryptography equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and NSA Guidance for Transition to Quantum-Resistant Cryptography?

Of 192 total NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls, 4 map directly to NSA Guidance for Transition to Quantum-Resistant Cryptography controls — representing 2% coverage. The remaining 188 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 to NSA Guidance for Transition to Quantum-Resistant Cryptography?

188 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls have no direct equivalent in NSA Guidance for Transition to Quantum-Resistant Cryptography. The highest concentration of gaps is in AC - Access Control with 15 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and NSA Guidance for Transition to Quantum-Resistant Cryptography?

The domain with the highest gap count is AC - Access Control (15 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.