TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5vsNIST SP 1800-32

See exactly how NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls map to NIST SP 1800-32. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

48
Controls Mapped
144
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 maps to NIST SP 1800-32 with 10% coverage across 19 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 192 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls identifies 173 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in SC - System and Communications Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 192 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 48 mapped controls across 8 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

AC - Access Control(9 mappings)

NIST800-AC-2Account management3 targets
→NIST1800-32-07Personnel risk assessment
→NIST1800-32-08Electronic access perimeter management
→NIST1800-32-09Interactive remote access security
NIST800-AC-20Use of external systems3 targets
→NIST1800-32-07Personnel risk assessment
→NIST1800-32-08Electronic access perimeter management
→NIST1800-32-09Interactive remote access security
NIST800-AC-7Unsuccessful logon attempts3 targets
→NIST1800-32-07Personnel risk assessment
→NIST1800-32-08Electronic access perimeter management
→NIST1800-32-09Interactive remote access security

CA - Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring(1 mappings)

NIST800-CA-7Continuous monitoring
→NIST1800-32-13Network security monitoring

CM - Configuration Management(5 mappings)

NIST800-CM-3Configuration change control
→NIST1800-32-23Change management procedures
NIST800-CM-4Impact analyses2 targets
→NIST1800-32-14System security hardening
→NIST1800-32-22Configuration management for OT systems
NIST800-CM-9Configuration management plan2 targets
→NIST1800-32-14System security hardening
→NIST1800-32-22Configuration management for OT systems

CP - Contingency Planning(5 mappings)

NIST800-CP-10System recovery and reconstitution3 targets
→NIST1800-32-18Reporting obligations to authorities
→NIST1800-32-19Coordination with sector-specific agencies
→NIST1800-32-20Exercises and drills for OT incidents
NIST800-CP-9System backup2 targets
→NIST1800-32-18Reporting obligations to authorities
→NIST1800-32-19Coordination with sector-specific agencies

+28 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 comparisons

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs ISO 27001:2022130 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-17140 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements34 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security32 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs CMMC 2.032 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs Canada ITSG-33 - IT Security Risk Management31 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs APRA CPS 23431 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs API 116431 mappings

Other NIST SP 1800-32 comparisons

API 1164 vs NIST SP 1800-3216 mappingsISO 27019 vs NIST SP 1800-3216 mappingsIEC 62443 vs NIST SP 1800-3216 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST SP 1800-3215 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs NIST SP 1800-3214 mappingsTSA Pipeline Security vs NIST SP 1800-3214 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs NIST SP 1800-3213 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs NIST SP 1800-3212 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and NIST SP 1800-32?

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 has 192 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 1800-32 covers 44 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 19 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SC - System and Communications Protection, where 17 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls have no direct NIST SP 1800-32 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and NIST SP 1800-32?

Of 192 total NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls, 19 map directly to NIST SP 1800-32 controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 173 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 to NIST SP 1800-32?

173 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 1800-32. The highest concentration of gaps is in SC - System and Communications Protection with 17 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and NIST SP 1800-32?

The domain with the highest gap count is SC - System and Communications Protection (17 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.