TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning GuidevsISO 22000

See exactly how NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide controls map to ISO 22000. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
15
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide maps to ISO 22000 with 12% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 17 NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide controls identifies 15 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Contingency Plan Development.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 17 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Contingency Planning Fundamentals(1 mappings)

CP34-FND-01Contingency Planning Policy
→ISO22000-03Legal and regulatory compliance

Plan Testing, Training and Maintenance(1 mappings)

CP34-TST-02Test Documentation and After-Action Reports
→ISO22000-15Corrective actions and lessons learned

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide comparisons

NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements7 mappingsNIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide vs South Korea ISMS-P7 mappingsNIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange7 mappingsNIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide vs DAMA-DMBOK2 — Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition)6 mappingsNIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)6 mappingsNIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide vs BSIMM6 mappingsNIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide vs Azure Security Benchmark6 mappingsNIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide vs OWASP ASVS6 mappings

Other ISO 22000 comparisons

ISO 45001 vs ISO 220003 mappingsIMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) vs ISO 220002 mappingsGLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 vs ISO 220002 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs ISO 220002 mappingsIATF 16949:2016 — Quality Management System for Automotive Production vs ISO 220002 mappingsILO Nursing Personnel Convention C149 (1977) vs ISO 220002 mappings6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673) vs ISO 220002 mappingsISO 8000 — Data Quality vs ISO 220002 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide and ISO 22000?

NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide has 17 controls across its framework, while ISO 22000 covers 15 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Contingency Plan Development, where 5 NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide controls have no direct ISO 22000 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide and ISO 22000?

Of 17 total NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide controls, 2 map directly to ISO 22000 controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 15 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide to ISO 22000?

15 NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 22000. The highest concentration of gaps is in Contingency Plan Development with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-34 Rev 1 — Contingency Planning Guide and ISO 22000?

The domain with the highest gap count is Contingency Plan Development (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.