Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-218vsFedRAMP High

See exactly how NIST SP 800-218 controls map to FedRAMP High. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

88
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
95%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-218 maps to FedRAMP High with 95% coverage across 40 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 42 NIST SP 800-218 controls identifies 2 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Respond to Vulnerabilities.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 42 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 88 mapped controls across 8 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Prepare the Organization(13 mappings)

SP800-218-PO.1.1Define Security Requirements for Software Development2 targets
SA-15Development Process, Standards, and Tools. a. Require the developer of the system, system component, or system service to follow a documented development process that: 1. Explicitly addresses security and privacy requirements; 2. Identifies the
SA-3System Development Life Cycle
SP800-218-PO.1.2Implement Security Requirements in the Toolchain
SA-15Development Process, Standards, and Tools. a. Require the developer of the system, system component, or system service to follow a documented development process that: 1. Explicitly addresses security and privacy requirements; 2. Identifies the
SP800-218-PO.2.1Roles and Responsibilities for Secure Development2 targets
PS-9Position Descriptions. Incorporate security and privacy roles and responsibilities into organizational position descriptions
SA-3System Development Life Cycle
SP800-218-PO.2.2Training and Skills Maintenance
AT-3Role-Based Training
SP800-218-PO.3.1Supporting Toolchain Selection
SA-15Development Process, Standards, and Tools. a. Require the developer of the system, system component, or system service to follow a documented development process that: 1. Explicitly addresses security and privacy requirements; 2. Identifies the
SP800-218-PO.3.2Toolchain Configuration and Integration3 targets
CM-9Configuration Management Plan
SA-10Developer Configuration Management
SA-15Development Process, Standards, and Tools. a. Require the developer of the system, system component, or system service to follow a documented development process that: 1. Explicitly addresses security and privacy requirements; 2. Identifies the
SP800-218-PO.4.1Criteria for Software Security2 targets
SA-3System Development Life Cycle
SA-4(1)Acquisition Process | Functional Properties of Controls. Require the developer of the system, system component, or system service to provide a description of the functional properties of the controls to be implemented
SP800-218-PO.5.1Secure Development Environment Implementation
CM-5(5)Access Restrictions for Change | Privilege Limitation for Production and Operation. (a) Limit privileges to change system components and system-related information within a production or operational environment; and (b) Review and reevaluate privileges [Assignment:

NIST SP 800-218: Information Security Policies(7 mappings)

SP800-218-PO.1.3Communicate Requirements to Third-Party Providers4 targets
SA-4Acquisition Process
SA-9External System Services
SR-3Supply Chain Controls and Processes (SR-3)
SR-5Acquisition Strategies, Tools, and Methods (SR-5)
SP800-218-PO.2.3Obtain Management Commitment to Secure Development
SA-1Policy and Procedures
SP800-218-PO.3.3Toolchain Generates Security Artifacts
SA-11Developer Testing and Evaluation
SP800-218-PO.4.2Gather and Safeguard Security Check Information
SA-11Developer Testing and Evaluation

+68 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

A NIST SP 800-218 to FedRAMP High crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which FedRAMP High controls your existing NIST SP 800-218 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

NIST SP 800-218 into FedRAMP High
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

FedRAMP High into NIST SP 800-218
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST SP 800-218 to FedRAMP High (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 95% in the header counts how many NIST SP 800-218 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many FedRAMP High controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-218 and FedRAMP High?

NIST SP 800-218 has 42 controls across its framework, while FedRAMP High covers 417 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 40 overlapping controls (95% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Respond to Vulnerabilities, where 1 NIST SP 800-218 controls have no direct FedRAMP High equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-218 and FedRAMP High?

Of 42 total NIST SP 800-218 controls, 40 map directly to FedRAMP High controls, representing 95% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-218 to FedRAMP High?

2 NIST SP 800-218 controls have no direct equivalent in FedRAMP High. The highest concentration of gaps is in Respond to Vulnerabilities with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-218 and FedRAMP High?

The domain with the highest gap count is Respond to Vulnerabilities (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.