TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsNIST SP 800-30

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to NIST SP 800-30. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
25
Gaps Found
11%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to NIST SP 800-30 with 11% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 31 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Protection and Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Access Control and Identification(1 mappings)

3.1Physical Security
→NISTSP30-8Risk Assessment Maintenance, Continuous Monitoring, and Integration with the RMF

Audit, Assessment, and Monitoring(3 mappings)

3.11Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest3 targets
→NISTSP30-3Threat Source and Threat Event Identification
→NISTSP30-4Vulnerability and Predisposing Condition Identification
→NISTSP30-6Risk Determination, Uncertainty, and Sensitivity Analysis

Incident Response and Media Protection(6 mappings)

3.16System and Services Acquisition3 targets
→NISTSP30-1Risk Management Strategy and Risk Assessment Programme Establishment
→NISTSP30-2Three-Tier Risk Assessment Scoping (Organisation, Mission/Business, Information System)
→NISTSP30-8Risk Assessment Maintenance, Continuous Monitoring, and Integration with the RMF
3.17Supply Chain Risk Management3 targets
→NISTSP30-1Risk Management Strategy and Risk Assessment Programme Establishment
→NISTSP30-2Three-Tier Risk Assessment Scoping (Organisation, Mission/Business, Information System)
→NISTSP30-8Risk Assessment Maintenance, Continuous Monitoring, and Integration with the RMF

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security20 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 518 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs MTCS (Singapore)17 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST Privacy Framework16 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-14615 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-14515 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-14415 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ISMAP (Japan)15 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-30 comparisons

UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs NIST SP 800-306 mappingsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation vs NIST SP 800-306 mappingsAS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System vs NIST SP 800-306 mappingsISO/IEC 27003:2017 vs NIST SP 800-306 mappingsISO 31000 vs NIST SP 800-306 mappingsISO 27005 vs NIST SP 800-306 mappingsAML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) vs NIST SP 800-306 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs NIST SP 800-306 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and NIST SP 800-30?

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-30 covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Protection and Communications, where 15 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct NIST SP 800-30 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and NIST SP 800-30?

Of 35 total NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 4 map directly to NIST SP 800-30 controls — representing 11% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements to NIST SP 800-30?

31 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-30. The highest concentration of gaps is in System Protection and Communications with 15 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and NIST SP 800-30?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Protection and Communications (15 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.