Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsMDS2 (Medical Device)

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to MDS2 (Medical Device). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
22
Gaps Found
29%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to MDS2 (Medical Device) with 29% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 25 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Protection and Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

System Protection and Communications(6 mappings)

3.10Encrypt Sensitive Data in Transit3 targets
MDS2-PHI-Data-Handling-DATA-Storage-STCF-Transmission-TXCF-TXIG-Encryption-FIPSMDS2 PHI Handling + DATA + STCF Storage + TXCF Transmission + TXIG Integrity + Encryption + FIPS
MDS2-Person-Node-Authentication-Authorization-Auto-Logoff-AUTH-PAUT-NAUTMDS2 Authentication + Authorization + Auto Logoff + PAUT + NAUT + AUTH + Identity Management
MDS2-Physical-Security-PLOK-Workstation-Disposal-Backup-DTBK-Disaster-RecoveryMDS2 Physical Security + PLOK + Workstation + Disposal + Backup + DTBK + Disaster Recovery
FEDRAMP-SC-13Cryptographic Protection
MDS2-PHI-Data-Handling-DATA-Storage-STCF-Transmission-TXCF-TXIG-Encryption-FIPSMDS2 PHI Handling + DATA + STCF Storage + TXCF Transmission + TXIG Integrity + Encryption + FIPS
FEDRAMP-SC-28Protection of Information at Rest
MDS2-PHI-Data-Handling-DATA-Storage-STCF-Transmission-TXCF-TXIG-Encryption-FIPSMDS2 PHI Handling + DATA + STCF Storage + TXCF Transmission + TXIG Integrity + Encryption + FIPS
FEDRAMP-SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity
MDS2-PHI-Data-Handling-DATA-Storage-STCF-Transmission-TXCF-TXIG-Encryption-FIPSMDS2 PHI Handling + DATA + STCF Storage + TXCF Transmission + TXIG Integrity + Encryption + FIPS

Audit, Assessment, and Monitoring(2 mappings)

3.11Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest
MDS2-Audit-Logging-AUDT-Integrity-IGAU-Cybersecurity-Risk-CYBR-MonitoringMDS2 Audit Controls + AUDT + Integrity + IGAU + Cybersecurity Risk + CYBR + Continuous Monitoring
3.3.1Audit Record Creation
MDS2-Audit-Logging-AUDT-Integrity-IGAU-Cybersecurity-Risk-CYBR-MonitoringMDS2 Audit Controls + AUDT + Integrity + IGAU + Cybersecurity Risk + CYBR + Continuous Monitoring

Awareness, Training, and Personnel(2 mappings)

3.2.1Account data storage minimised
MDS2-Roadmap-Third-Party-RDMP-Security-Guidance-SGUD-SBOM-Vulnerability-Disclosure-ProgrammeMDS2 Roadmap + RDMP + Third Party + Security Guidance + SGUD + SBOM + Vulnerability Disclosure + Coordinated
3.9Encrypt Data on Removable Media
MDS2-Audit-Logging-AUDT-Integrity-IGAU-Cybersecurity-Risk-CYBR-MonitoringMDS2 Audit Controls + AUDT + Integrity + IGAU + Cybersecurity Risk + CYBR + Continuous Monitoring

Access Control and Identification(3 mappings)

3.7Establish and Maintain a Data Classification Scheme
MDS2-Person-Node-Authentication-Authorization-Auto-Logoff-AUTH-PAUT-NAUTMDS2 Authentication + Authorization + Auto Logoff + PAUT + NAUT + AUTH + Identity Management
3.7.1Key generation procedures2 targets
MDS2-PHI-Data-Handling-DATA-Storage-STCF-Transmission-TXCF-TXIG-Encryption-FIPSMDS2 PHI Handling + DATA + STCF Storage + TXCF Transmission + TXIG Integrity + Encryption + FIPS
MDS2-Person-Node-Authentication-Authorization-Auto-Logoff-AUTH-PAUT-NAUTMDS2 Authentication + Authorization + Auto Logoff + PAUT + NAUT + AUTH + Identity Management

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

Other MDS2 (Medical Device) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 723 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and MDS2 (Medical Device)?

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls across its framework, while MDS2 (Medical Device) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (29% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Protection and Communications, where 11 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct MDS2 (Medical Device) equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and MDS2 (Medical Device)?

Of 35 total NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 10 map directly to MDS2 (Medical Device) controls — representing 29% coverage. The remaining 25 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements to MDS2 (Medical Device)?

25 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in MDS2 (Medical Device). The highest concentration of gaps is in System Protection and Communications with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements and MDS2 (Medical Device)?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Protection and Communications (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.