TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsEMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
16
Gaps Found
26%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol with 26% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 26 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Protection and Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Audit, Assessment, and Monitoring(4 mappings)

3.11Risk Assessment
→3DS-2.2Device Information Collection
3.3Record Completion and Maintenance3 targets
→3DS-1.1Three-Domain Model
→3DS-2.1SDK Architecture
→3DS-4.3Split-SDK Specification

Access Control and Identification(6 mappings)

3.7Identification and Authentication3 targets
→3DS-1.2Authentication Request/Response
→3DS-1.3Challenge Flow
→3DS-2.1SDK Architecture
3.7.1Multi-Factor Authentication Assessment3 targets
→3DS-1.2Authentication Request/Response
→3DS-1.3Challenge Flow
→3DS-2.1SDK Architecture

System Protection and Communications(9 mappings)

FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings3 targets
→3DS-1.1Three-Domain Model
→3DS-2.1SDK Architecture
→3DS-4.3Split-SDK Specification
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup3 targets
→3DS-1.1Three-Domain Model
→3DS-2.1SDK Architecture
→3DS-4.3Split-SDK Specification
FEDRAMP-SC-13Cryptographic Protection
→3DS-3.3Data Encryption
FEDRAMP-SC-28Protection of Information at Rest
→3DS-3.3Data Encryption
FEDRAMP-SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity
→3DS-3.3Data Encryption

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202121 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity21 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange20 mappings

Other EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol comparisons

Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) vs EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol8 mappingsConnecticut Data Privacy Act (CTDPA) vs EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol8 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol7 mappingsUK Open Banking Standard vs EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol7 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol7 mappingsDigital Economy Partnership Agreement (DEPA) vs EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol7 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol7 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol7 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol?

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls across its framework, while EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol covers 15 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (26% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Protection and Communications, where 10 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol?

Of 35 total NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 9 map directly to EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol controls — representing 26% coverage. The remaining 26 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements to EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol?

26 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol. The highest concentration of gaps is in System Protection and Communications with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and EMV 3-D Secure (3DS2) — Payment Authentication Protocol?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Protection and Communications (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.