TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171vsFTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171 controls map to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
90
Gaps Found
2%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171 maps to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 2% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 94 NIST SP 800-171 controls identifies 92 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System and Communications Protection.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 94 controls analysed | 719 frameworks | 428K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 428K+ mappings across 719 frameworks.

Audit and Accountability Assessment(1 mappings)

3.3.1Audit Record Creation
→FTC-314.4c8Monitoring and Logging

Incident Response Assessment(3 mappings)

3.6.1Incident Response Capability3 targets
→FTC-314.4jFTC Breach Notification
→LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
→Sec. 314.4(h)Incident response plan

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171 comparisons

NIST SP 800-171 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 538 mappingsNIST SP 800-171 vs NIST SP 800-2079 mappingsNIST SP 800-171 vs ACSC Essential Eight4 mappingsNIST SP 800-171 vs FISMA2 mappingsNIST SP 800-171 vs FedRAMP Rev 52 mappingsNIST SP 800-171 vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)2 mappingsNIST SP 800-171 vs Saudi NCA ECC2 mappingsNIST SP 800-171 vs BSI IT-Grundschutz2 mappings

Other FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)22 mappingsTISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)19 mappingsUK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)18 mappingsOman National Cybersecurity Framework vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)18 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)18 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)18 mappingsMARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)18 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)18 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 719 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 719 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (428K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171 and FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

NIST SP 800-171 has 94 controls across its framework, while FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 52 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (2% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System and Communications Protection, where 7 NIST SP 800-171 controls have no direct FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171 and FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 94 total NIST SP 800-171 controls, 2 map directly to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 2% coverage. The remaining 92 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171 to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

92 NIST SP 800-171 controls have no direct equivalent in FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in System and Communications Protection with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171 and FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is System and Communications Protection (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.