Cross-Framework Mapping

New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)vsFTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) controls map to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

44
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
27%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) maps to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 27% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 44 New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) controls identifies 32 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 44 controls analysed | 730 frameworks | 488K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 44 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 488K+ mappings across 730 frameworks.

Security Controls(20 mappings)

CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue5 targets
FTC-314.4c1Access Controls
FTC-314.4c5Multi-Factor Authentication
FTC-314.4jFTC Breach Notification
LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
Sec. 314.4(h)Incident response plan
KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management8 targets
FTC-314.4bWritten Risk Assessment
FTC-314.4gProgram Evaluation and Adjustment
FTC-314.4iBoard / Senior Officer Reporting
FTC-314.4jFTC Breach Notification
FTC-314.5Exemption for Small Institutions
LLOYDS-IR-01Incident Response Plan
LLOYDS-IR-03Resilience and Recovery
Sec. 314.4(h)Incident response plan
MARSE-SC-01NIST 800-53 Moderate Baseline
NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection
MARSE-SC-02Federal Tax Information Protection4 targets
FTC-314.4c1Access Controls
FTC-314.4c3Encryption
FTC-314.4c5Multi-Factor Authentication
FTC-314.4c8Monitoring and Logging
MARSE-SC-03Identity Verification
FTC-314.4c5Multi-Factor Authentication
NRC73-CTL-03Configuration Management
FTC-314.4c7Change Management

+24 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 730 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) comparisons

Other FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 730 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 730 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (488K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) and FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) has 44 controls across its framework, while FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 52 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (27% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security Controls, where 9 New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) controls have no direct FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) and FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 44 total New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) controls, 12 map directly to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 27% coverage. The remaining 32 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

32 New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) controls have no direct equivalent in FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Security Controls with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) and FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security Controls (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.