NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile DevicesvsUK GDPR (UK General Data Protection Regulation)
See exactly how NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices controls map to UK GDPR (UK General Data Protection Regulation). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices maps to UK GDPR (UK General Data Protection Regulation) with 12% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 34 NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices controls identifies 30 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Technical Controls.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 34 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Mobile Device Security Controls(1 mappings)
Mobile Device Policies(5 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices comparisons
Other UK GDPR (UK General Data Protection Regulation) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices and UK GDPR (UK General Data Protection Regulation)?
NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices has 34 controls across its framework, while UK GDPR (UK General Data Protection Regulation) covers 6 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Technical Controls, where 5 NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices controls have no direct UK GDPR (UK General Data Protection Regulation) equivalent.
How many controls map between NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices and UK GDPR (UK General Data Protection Regulation)?
Of 34 total NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices controls, 4 map directly to UK GDPR (UK General Data Protection Regulation) controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices to UK GDPR (UK General Data Protection Regulation)?
30 NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices controls have no direct equivalent in UK GDPR (UK General Data Protection Regulation). The highest concentration of gaps is in Technical Controls with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-124 Revision 2 - Guidelines for Managing the Security of Mobile Devices and UK GDPR (UK General Data Protection Regulation)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Technical Controls (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.