Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment)vsAzure Security Benchmark

See exactly how NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) controls map to Azure Security Benchmark. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) maps to Azure Security Benchmark with 50% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Post-Test Phase.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Planning(1 mappings)

NISTSP115-1Scope, Methodology, and Assessment Planning
ASB-01Shared responsibility model definition

Review Techniques(1 mappings)

NISTSP115-2Review Techniques - Documentation, Logs, Rulesets, Configurations
ASB-21Cloud security monitoring and logging

Target Identification(1 mappings)

NISTSP115-3Target Identification and Analysis - Network Discovery, Port and Service ID, Vuln Scanning
ASB-23Cloud vulnerability management

Operations Support(7 mappings)

NISTSP115-8Operational Considerations - Tools, Reporting Templates, ISMS Integration, Annex Material7 targets
ASB-06Cloud identity management
ASB-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud
ASB-08Privileged access in cloud environments
ASB-11Data classification for cloud
ASB-12Encryption of cloud-stored data
ASB-14Data backup and recovery in cloud
ASB-16Virtual network segmentation

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 723 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) and Azure Security Benchmark?

NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) has 8 controls across its framework, while Azure Security Benchmark covers 54 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Post-Test Phase, where 1 NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) controls have no direct Azure Security Benchmark equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) and Azure Security Benchmark?

Of 8 total NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) controls, 4 map directly to Azure Security Benchmark controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) to Azure Security Benchmark?

4 NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) controls have no direct equivalent in Azure Security Benchmark. The highest concentration of gaps is in Post-Test Phase with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-115 (Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment) and Azure Security Benchmark?

The domain with the highest gap count is Post-Test Phase (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.