TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0vsChina Cybersecurity Law (CSL)

See exactly how NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls map to China Cybersecurity Law (CSL). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
99
Gaps Found
4%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 maps to China Cybersecurity Law (CSL) with 4% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls identifies 102 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in GV - Govern.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 106 controls analysed | 704 frameworks | 359K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 359K+ mappings across 704 frameworks.

ID - Identify(4 mappings)

NIST-CSF-ID.AM-01Inventories of hardware managed by the organization are maintained2 targets
→CSL-Art21Multi-Level Protection Scheme (MLPS) - Art. 21
→CSL-Art31Critical Information Infrastructure Designation - Art. 31
NIST-CSF-ID.RA-01Vulnerabilities in assets are identified, validated, and recorded2 targets
→CSL-Art22Security of Network Products and Services - Art. 22
→CSL-Art38CII Annual Security Inspection - Art. 38

PR - Protect(1 mappings)

NIST-CSF-PR.AA-01Identities and credentials for authorized users, services, and hardware are managed
→CSL-Art34CII Operator Security Obligations - Art. 34

RS - Respond(2 mappings)

NIST-CSF-RS.MA-01The incident response plan is executed in coordination with relevant third parties2 targets
→CSL-Art34CII Operator Security Obligations - Art. 34
→CSL-Art51Cybersecurity Monitoring and Early Warning - Art. 51

Related Comparisons

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ISO 27001:202282 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Belgium CyberFundamentals32 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices32 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs ASEAN Data Management Framework25 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Azure Security Benchmark22 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security22 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)19 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)19 mappings

Other China Cybersecurity Law (CSL) comparisons

GDPR vs China Cybersecurity Law (CSL)5 mappingsChina Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) vs China Cybersecurity Law (CSL)3 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs China Cybersecurity Law (CSL)2 mappingsRwanda Law No. 058/2021 Relating to the Protection of Personal Data vs China Cybersecurity Law (CSL)1 mappingsChina Data Security Law (DSL) vs China Cybersecurity Law (CSL)1 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 704 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 704 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (359K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and China Cybersecurity Law (CSL)?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 has 106 controls across its framework, while China Cybersecurity Law (CSL) covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (4% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GV - Govern, where 28 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct China Cybersecurity Law (CSL) equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and China Cybersecurity Law (CSL)?

Of 106 total NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, 4 map directly to China Cybersecurity Law (CSL) controls — representing 4% coverage. The remaining 102 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to China Cybersecurity Law (CSL)?

102 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in China Cybersecurity Law (CSL). The highest concentration of gaps is in GV - Govern with 28 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and China Cybersecurity Law (CSL)?

The domain with the highest gap count is GV - Govern (28 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.