TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0vsAustralia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)

See exactly how NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls map to Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

47
Controls Mapped
59
Gaps Found
41%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 maps to Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) with 41% coverage across 43 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls identifies 63 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in GV - Govern.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 106 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 47 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

DE - Detect(4 mappings)

NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet the defined incident criteria
→AUCDR-IS-STEP5Step 5 - Manage and report security incidents
NIST-CSF-DE.CM-01Networks and network services are monitored to find potentially adverse events
→AUCDR-IS-5Limit, prevent, detect and remove malware
NIST-CSF-DE.CM-03Personnel activity and technology usage are monitored to find potentially adverse events
→AUCDR-IS-1Limit risk of unauthorised access to the CDR data environment
NIST-CSF-DE.CM-09Computing hardware and software, runtime environments, and their data are monitored to find potentially adverse events
→AUCDR-IS-5Limit, prevent, detect and remove malware

GV - Govern(8 mappings)

NIST-CSF-GV.OC-03Legal, regulatory, and contractual requirements regarding cybersecurity - including privacy and civil liberties obligations - are understood and managed
→AUCDR-IS-STEP1Step 1 - Define and implement security governance for CDR data
NIST-CSF-GV.PO-01Policy for managing cybersecurity risks is established based on organizational context, cybersecurity strategy, and priorities and is communicated and enforced2 targets
→AUCDR-IS-STEP1Step 1 - Define and implement security governance for CDR data
→AUCDR-PS-1Privacy Safeguard 1 - Open and transparent management of CDR data
NIST-CSF-GV.PO-02Policy for managing cybersecurity risks is reviewed, updated, communicated, and enforced to reflect changes in requirements, threats, technology, and organizational mission
→AUCDR-IS-STEP1Step 1 - Define and implement security governance for CDR data
NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction that describes appropriate risk response options is established and communicated
→AUCDR-IS-STEP3Step 3 - Have and maintain an information security capability
NIST-CSF-GV.RR-01Organizational leadership is responsible and accountable for cybersecurity risk and fosters a culture that is risk-aware, ethical, and continually improving
→AUCDR-IS-STEP1Step 1 - Define and implement security governance for CDR data
NIST-CSF-GV.RR-02Roles, responsibilities, and authorities related to cybersecurity risk management are established, communicated, understood, and enforced
→AUCDR-IS-STEP1Step 1 - Define and implement security governance for CDR data
NIST-CSF-GV.RR-04Cybersecurity is included in human resources practices
→AUCDR-IS-6Information security training and awareness program

ID - Identify(8 mappings)

NIST-CSF-ID.AM-02Inventories of software, services, and systems managed by the organization are maintained
→AUCDR-IS-STEP2Step 2 - Define the boundaries of the CDR data environment
NIST-CSF-ID.AM-05Assets are prioritized based on classification, criticality, resources, and impact on the mission
→AUCDR-IS-STEP2Step 2 - Define the boundaries of the CDR data environment
NIST-CSF-ID.AM-07Inventories of data and corresponding metadata for designated data types are maintained2 targets
→AUCDR-IS-3Securely manage information assets over their lifecycle
→AUCDR-IS-STEP2Step 2 - Define the boundaries of the CDR data environment
NIST-CSF-ID.AM-08Systems, hardware, software, services, and data are managed throughout their life cycles2 targets
→AUCDR-IS-3Securely manage information assets over their lifecycle
→AUCDR-PS-12Privacy Safeguard 12 - Security of CDR data and destruction or de-identification of redundant CDR data
NIST-CSF-ID.IM-01Improvements are identified from evaluations
→AUCDR-IS-STEP4Step 4 - Implement a formal controls assessment program
NIST-CSF-ID.IM-02Improvements are identified from security tests and exercises, including those done in coordination with suppliers and relevant third parties
→AUCDR-IS-STEP4Step 4 - Implement a formal controls assessment program

+27 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) controls your existing NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 into Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) into NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
22.6%

24 of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR). 82 are genuine gaps.

50%PR - Protect
33.3%ID - Identify
14.3%GV - Govern
15.4%RS - Respond
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 47 candidate mappings were examined and 1 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: NIST-CSF-GV.PO-01 Policy for managing cybersecurity risks is established based on organizational context,...

Step 1 requires a maintained information security policy for CDR data risk.

Grounded in AUCDR-IS-STEP1 Step 1 - Define and implement security governance for CDR data. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: NIST-CSF-DE.AE-02 Potentially adverse events are analyzed to better understand associated activities

Potentially adverse events are analyzed to better understand associated activities. Control from NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 framework, domain: DE - Detect.

Every one of the 24 evidenced controls and 82 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 41% in the header counts how many NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Related Comparisons

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5106 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1104 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE104 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs FedRAMP Moderate104 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH104 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs FedRAMP High104 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs SOC 2104 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs Australian Information Security Manual103 mappings

Other Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) comparisons

GDPR vs Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)24 mappingsAPEC Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) System vs Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)23 mappingsISO 27701:2019 vs Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)23 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)21 mappingsSOC 2 vs Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)20 mappingsFedRAMP Moderate vs Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)18 mappingsFedRAMP High vs Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)18 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE vs Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)17 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 686 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 has 106 controls across its framework, while Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 43 overlapping controls (41% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GV - Govern, where 21 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)?

Of 106 total NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, 43 map directly to Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR) controls, representing 41% coverage. The remaining 63 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)?

63 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR). The highest concentration of gaps is in GV - Govern with 21 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and Australia Consumer Data Right - Banking (CDR)?

The domain with the highest gap count is GV - Govern (21 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.