Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0vsANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0)

See exactly how NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls map to ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

113
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
56%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 maps to ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) with 56% coverage across 59 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls identifies 47 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in GV - Govern.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 106 controls analysed | 908 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 113 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 908 frameworks.

DE - Detect(7 mappings)

NIST-CSF-DE.AE-02Potentially adverse events are analyzed to better understand associated activities
→ANSSI-HYG-36Enable and Configure Logging on the Most Important Components
NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet the defined incident criteria
→ANSSI-HYG-40Define a Security Incident Management Procedure
NIST-CSF-DE.CM-01Networks and network services are monitored to find potentially adverse events
→ANSSI-HYG-22Put in Place a Secure Internet Access Gateway
NIST-CSF-DE.CM-02The physical environment is monitored to find potentially adverse events
→ANSSI-HYG-26Control and Protect Access to Server Rooms and Technical Areas
NIST-CSF-DE.CM-06External service provider activities and services are monitored to find potentially adverse events
→ANSSI-HYG-25Secure Dedicated Network Interconnections with Partners
NIST-CSF-DE.CM-09Computing hardware and software, runtime environments, and their data are monitored to find potentially adverse events2 targets
→ANSSI-HYG-24Protect the Corporate Mail Service
→ANSSI-HYG-36Enable and Configure Logging on the Most Important Components

GV - Govern(13 mappings)

NIST-CSF-GV.OC-03Legal, regulatory, and contractual requirements regarding cybersecurity - including privacy and civil liberties obligations - are understood and managed
→ANSSI-HYG-02Raise User Awareness of Basic Security Practice
NIST-CSF-GV.PO-01Policy for managing cybersecurity risks is established based on organizational context, cybersecurity strategy, and priorities and is communicated and enforced2 targets
→ANSSI-HYG-33Adopt Security Policies Dedicated to Mobile Terminals
→ANSSI-HYG-41Conduct a Formal Risk Analysis
NIST-CSF-GV.PO-02Policy for managing cybersecurity risks is reviewed, updated, communicated, and enforced to reflect changes in requirements, threats, technology, and organizational mission
→ANSSI-HYG-16Use a Centralised Management Tool to Standardise Security Policies
NIST-CSF-GV.RM-01Risk management objectives are established and agreed to by organizational stakeholders
→ANSSI-HYG-41Conduct a Formal Risk Analysis
NIST-CSF-GV.RM-05Lines of communication across the organization are established for cybersecurity risks, including risks from suppliers and other third parties
→ANSSI-HYG-39Designate an Information System Security Officer and Make the Role Known
NIST-CSF-GV.RM-06A standardized method for calculating, documenting, categorizing, and prioritizing cybersecurity risks is established and communicated
→ANSSI-HYG-41Conduct a Formal Risk Analysis
NIST-CSF-GV.RR-01Organizational leadership is responsible and accountable for cybersecurity risk and fosters a culture that is risk-aware, ethical, and continually improving
→ANSSI-HYG-39Designate an Information System Security Officer and Make the Role Known
NIST-CSF-GV.RR-02Roles, responsibilities, and authorities related to cybersecurity risk management are established, communicated, understood, and enforced
→ANSSI-HYG-39Designate an Information System Security Officer and Make the Role Known
NIST-CSF-GV.RR-04Cybersecurity is included in human resources practices
→ANSSI-HYG-06Organise Joiner, Leaver and Role Change Procedures
NIST-CSF-GV.SC-02Cybersecurity roles and responsibilities for suppliers, customers, and partners are established, communicated, and coordinated internally and externally
→ANSSI-HYG-03Control the Risks of Outsourced Information System Management
NIST-CSF-GV.SC-04Suppliers are known and prioritized by criticality
→ANSSI-HYG-03Control the Risks of Outsourced Information System Management
NIST-CSF-GV.SC-05Requirements to address cybersecurity risks in supply chains are established, prioritized, and integrated into contracts and other types of agreements with suppliers and other relevant third parties
→ANSSI-HYG-01Train Operational Teams in Information System Security

+93 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 908 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) controls your existing NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 into ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) lands at 71.4%, while ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) into NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 lands at 25.5%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 evidence buys you for ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0), the other asks the reverse.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 into ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0)
71.4%

30 of 42 ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. 12 are genuine gaps.

ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) into NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
25.5%

27 of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0). 79 are genuine gaps.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 56% in the header counts how many NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 908 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 908 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0)?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 has 106 controls across its framework, while ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) covers 42 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 59 overlapping controls (56% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GV - Govern, where 15 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0)?

Of 106 total NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, 59 map directly to ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0) controls, representing 56% coverage. The remaining 47 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0)?

47 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0). The highest concentration of gaps is in GV - Govern with 15 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and ANSSI Guide d'hygiene informatique (42 mesures, v2.0)?

The domain with the highest gap count is GV - Govern (15 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.