TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)vsCIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act)

See exactly how NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls map to CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

23
Controls Mapped
8
Gaps Found
39%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) maps to CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) with 39% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls identifies 19 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Govern.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 23 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Govern(8 mappings)

AIRMF-GOV-01AI Risk Management Policies4 targets
→64.2003Definitions
→AIDA-14AI and Data Commissioner
→Art. 2Consent Definition
→Sec. 2240(a)Definitions
AIRMF-GOV-02AI Risk Culture
→AIDA-14AI and Data Commissioner
NIST-AI600-GOV-1Legal and Regulatory Compliance3 targets
→AIDA-16Criminal Provisions
→Art. 49Collective Dispute Resolution
→Sec. 2243(b)Privacy and civil liberties protections

Manage(2 mappings)

AIRMF-MAN-03AI Incident Response
→Dir. 1Mandatory Incident Reporting
NIST-AI600-MGT-4Incident Response for GAI
→Dir. 1Mandatory Incident Reporting

Map(6 mappings)

AIRMF-MAP-02AI Risk Identification
→Dir. 3Incident Report Format
AIRMF-MAP-03AI Impact Assessment
→Dir. 3Incident Report Format
NIST-AI600-MAP-1GAI Risk Identification3 targets
→AIDA-16Criminal Provisions
→Art. 49Collective Dispute Resolution
→Sec. 2243(b)Privacy and civil liberties protections
NIST-AI600-MAP-2Stakeholder Impact Assessment
→Dir. 3Incident Report Format

Measure(4 mappings)

AIRMF-MEA-01AI Performance Metrics3 targets
→64.2003Definitions
→Art. 2Consent Definition
→Sec. 2240(a)Definitions
AIRMF-MEA-03AI Transparency and Explainability
→AIDA-14AI and Data Commissioner

+3 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) comparisons

NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs NIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profile14 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange14 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs EU Digital Markets Act14 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security14 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR)14 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202114 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation14 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)13 mappings

Other CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) comparisons

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act)10 mappingsISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act)9 mappingsILO Nursing Personnel Convention C149 (1977) vs CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act)9 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act)9 mappingsNIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profile vs CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act)9 mappingsUK GDPR (UK General Data Protection Regulation) vs CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act)9 mappingsDigital Economy Partnership Agreement (DEPA) vs CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act)9 mappingsASEAN Data Management Framework vs CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act)9 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act)?

NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) has 31 controls across its framework, while CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) covers 38 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (39% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Govern, where 6 NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls have no direct CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act)?

Of 31 total NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls, 12 map directly to CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) controls — representing 39% coverage. The remaining 19 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) to CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act)?

19 NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls have no direct equivalent in CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act). The highest concentration of gaps is in Govern with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Govern (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.