NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)vsUS ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security
See exactly how NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls map to US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) maps to US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security with 45% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls identifies 17 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Govern.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 28 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Govern(4 mappings)
Manage(10 mappings)
Map(6 mappings)
+8 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) comparisons
Other US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security?
NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) has 31 controls across its framework, while US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security covers 41 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (45% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Govern, where 7 NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls have no direct US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security equivalent.
How many controls map between NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security?
Of 31 total NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls, 14 map directly to US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security controls — representing 45% coverage. The remaining 17 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) to US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security?
17 NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls have no direct equivalent in US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security. The highest concentration of gaps is in Govern with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security?
The domain with the highest gap count is Govern (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.