Cross-Framework Mapping

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)vsCIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act)

See exactly how CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls map to CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
2
Gaps Found
33%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) maps to CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) with 33% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 15 CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Threat and Vulnerability Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 15 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Threat and Vulnerability Management(2 mappings)

AESCSF-TVM-1Vulnerability Assessment
Dir. 3Incident Report Format
AESCSF-TVM-2Threat Intelligence
Sec. 2246(d)Threat intelligence sharing

Data Security and Privacy(4 mappings)

CSA-DATA-04Privacy by Design4 targets
AIDA-16Criminal Provisions
Art. 49Collective Dispute Resolution
Dir. 3Incident Report Format
Sec. 2243(b)Privacy and civil liberties protections

Infrastructure and Operations Security(7 mappings)

CSA-INF-04Incident Management4 targets
64.2003Definitions
Art. 2Consent Definition
Dir. 1Mandatory Incident Reporting
Sec. 2240(a)Definitions
CSA-INF-05Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery3 targets
64.2003Definitions
Art. 2Consent Definition
Sec. 2240(a)Definitions

Related Comparisons

Other CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) comparisons

Other CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) and CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act)?

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) has 15 controls across its framework, while CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) covers 38 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (33% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Threat and Vulnerability Management, where 4 CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls have no direct CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) equivalent.

How many controls map between CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) and CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act)?

Of 15 total CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls, 5 map directly to CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act) controls — representing 33% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) to CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act)?

10 CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls have no direct equivalent in CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act). The highest concentration of gaps is in Threat and Vulnerability Management with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) and CIRCIA (Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Threat and Vulnerability Management (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.