TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NERC CIPvsVoluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)

See exactly how NERC CIP controls map to Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

1
Controls Mapped
7
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NERC CIP maps to Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) with 12% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NERC CIP controls identifies 7 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Supply Chain Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 1 of 1 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Incident and Recovery(1 mappings)

NERCCIP-6Incident Reporting and Response Planning + Recovery Plans (CIP-008 + CIP-009)
→VPSHR-3Implementation Guidance and Reporting

Related Comparisons

Other NERC CIP comparisons

NERC CIP vs ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management3 mappingsNERC CIP vs APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management3 mappingsNERC CIP vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements3 mappingsNERC CIP vs APRA CPS 2343 mappingsNERC CIP vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)3 mappingsNERC CIP vs NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)3 mappingsNERC CIP vs UK ONR Cyber Security and Information Assurance (CSIA) for Nuclear Facilities3 mappingsNERC CIP vs FFIEC IT Examination Handbook3 mappings

Other Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) comparisons

German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act (LkSG) vs Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)3 mappingsIEC 62443 vs Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)2 mappingsNIS2 Directive vs Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)2 mappingsILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work (Core Conventions) vs Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)2 mappingsBarbados Data Protection Act 2019 vs Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)2 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)2 mappingsAPI 1164 vs Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)2 mappingsRwanda Law No. 058/2021 Relating to the Protection of Personal Data vs Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)2 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 700 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NERC CIP and Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)?

NERC CIP has 8 controls across its framework, while Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Supply Chain Risk Management, where 1 NERC CIP controls have no direct Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) equivalent.

How many controls map between NERC CIP and Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)?

Of 8 total NERC CIP controls, 1 map directly to Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs) controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 7 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NERC CIP to Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)?

7 NERC CIP controls have no direct equivalent in Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs). The highest concentration of gaps is in Supply Chain Risk Management with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NERC CIP and Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights (VPs)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Supply Chain Risk Management (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.