Cross-Framework Mapping

Nebraska Data Privacy ActvsAustria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018)

See exactly how Nebraska Data Privacy Act controls map to Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

33
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
75%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Nebraska Data Privacy Act maps to Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) with 75% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Nebraska Data Privacy Act controls identifies 2 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Security and Incident Response.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 33 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

Scope and Applicability(8 mappings)

NDPA-1Applicability, Scope, and Carve-Outs8 targets
AT-DSG-10Section 29 - Liability and right to compensation / civil jurisdiction
AT-DSG-11Sections 42-45 - Data subject rights (law enforcement)
AT-DSG-12Section 62 - Administrative penalties
AT-DSG-13Section 36 - Scope of law enforcement processing
AT-DSG-14Section 38 - Lawfulness of law enforcement processing
AT-DSG-2Section 2 - Scope and application
AT-DSG-7Section 18 - Establishment of the Data Protection Authority
AT-DSG-8Section 22 - Functions and powers of the DPA

Consumer Rights(5 mappings)

NDPA-2Consumer Rights - Access, Correct, Delete, Portability, Appeal5 targets
AT-DSG-11Sections 42-45 - Data subject rights (law enforcement)
AT-DSG-13Section 36 - Scope of law enforcement processing
AT-DSG-14Section 38 - Lawfulness of law enforcement processing
AT-DSG-2Section 2 - Scope and application
AT-DSG-8Section 22 - Functions and powers of the DPA

Sensitive Data and Minors(6 mappings)

NDPA-4Sensitive Data Processing Consent and Childrens Protections6 targets
AT-DSG-10Section 29 - Liability and right to compensation / civil jurisdiction
AT-DSG-11Sections 42-45 - Data subject rights (law enforcement)
AT-DSG-12Section 62 - Administrative penalties
AT-DSG-13Section 36 - Scope of law enforcement processing
AT-DSG-14Section 38 - Lawfulness of law enforcement processing
AT-DSG-7Section 18 - Establishment of the Data Protection Authority

Privacy Notice and Data Hygiene(1 mappings)

NDPA-5Privacy Notice, Data Minimisation, and Purpose Limitation
AT-DSG-11Sections 42-45 - Data subject rights (law enforcement)

+13 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 706 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Nebraska Data Privacy Act comparisons

Other Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 706 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Nebraska Data Privacy Act and Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018)?

Nebraska Data Privacy Act has 8 controls across its framework, while Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) covers 14 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (75% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Security and Incident Response, where 1 Nebraska Data Privacy Act controls have no direct Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) equivalent.

How many controls map between Nebraska Data Privacy Act and Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018)?

Of 8 total Nebraska Data Privacy Act controls, 6 map directly to Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls — representing 75% coverage. The remaining 2 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Nebraska Data Privacy Act to Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018)?

2 Nebraska Data Privacy Act controls have no direct equivalent in Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018). The highest concentration of gaps is in Security and Incident Response with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Nebraska Data Privacy Act and Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Security and Incident Response (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.