NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)vsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems
See exactly how NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls map to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) maps to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems with 38% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cross-State Compliance.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Governance and Scope(1 mappings)
Information Security Program(1 mappings)
Third Party Management(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) comparisons
Other NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?
NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) has 8 controls across its framework, while NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cross-State Compliance, where 1 NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls have no direct NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems equivalent.
How many controls map between NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?
Of 8 total NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls, 3 map directly to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?
5 NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems. The highest concentration of gaps is in Cross-State Compliance with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?
The domain with the highest gap count is Cross-State Compliance (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.