TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)vsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)

See exactly how NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls map to IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
3
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) maps to IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) with 38% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cross-State Compliance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Governance and Scope(1 mappings)

NAIC-1NAIC Model Law Adoption, Scope, and Licensee Definitions
→IAEA-NSS17-GradedApproach-SecurityLevels-Risk-DBTIAEA NSS-17 - Graded Approach + Computer Security Levels + Risk-Informed Methodology + Threat Assessment + DBT Alignment + Consequence Analysis

Information Security Program(3 mappings)

NAIC-2Information Security Program (ISP) - Section 43 targets
→IAEA-NSS17-AccessControl-OT-IT-Authentication-AuthorizationIAEA NSS-17 - Access Control + Authentication + Authorization + IAM + Privileged Access for OT and IT
→IAEA-NSS17-GradedApproach-SecurityLevels-Risk-DBTIAEA NSS-17 - Graded Approach + Computer Security Levels + Risk-Informed Methodology + Threat Assessment + DBT Alignment + Consequence Analysis
→IAEA-NSS17-Scope-NSS-Family-CSP-EstablishmentIAEA NSS-17 + NSS-42-G - Scope + Nuclear Security Series Family + Computer Security Programme Establishment + Roles + Management System Integration

Third Party Management(1 mappings)

NAIC-5Third Party Service Provider Oversight - Section 4(F)(3) and Section 5
→IAEA-NSS17-Detect-Monitor-Logging-IR-Recovery-ExercisesIAEA NSS-17 - Detection + Monitoring + Logging + Incident Response + Recovery + Computer Security Exercises

Related Comparisons

Other NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) comparisons

NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs OWASP MASVS4 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs OWASP ASVS4 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs Azure Security Benchmark4 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition)4 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents4 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs ISO/SAE 214344 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar4 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements4 mappings

Other IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)8 mappingsISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)7 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)7 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)7 mappingsOWASP Top 10:2025 vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)6 mappingsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)6 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)6 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) and IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) has 8 controls across its framework, while IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cross-State Compliance, where 1 NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls have no direct IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) equivalent.

How many controls map between NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) and IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

Of 8 total NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls, 3 map directly to IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) to IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

5 NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls have no direct equivalent in IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1). The highest concentration of gaps is in Cross-State Compliance with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) and IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Cross-State Compliance (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.