Cross-Framework Mapping

NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)vsAS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System

See exactly how NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls map to AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
4
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) maps to AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System with 25% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cross-State Compliance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Governance and Scope(2 mappings)

NAIC-1NAIC Model Law Adoption, Scope, and Licensee Definitions2 targets
ISO27003-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities
ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment

Information Security Program(2 mappings)

NAIC-2Information Security Program (ISP) - Section 42 targets
ISO27003-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities
ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment

Related Comparisons

Other NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) comparisons

Other AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) and AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System?

NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) has 8 controls across its framework, while AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System covers 69 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cross-State Compliance, where 1 NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls have no direct AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System equivalent.

How many controls map between NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) and AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System?

Of 8 total NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls, 2 map directly to AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) to AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System?

6 NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) controls have no direct equivalent in AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System. The highest concentration of gaps is in Cross-State Compliance with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) and AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System?

The domain with the highest gap count is Cross-State Compliance (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.