TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

MTCS (Singapore)vsISO 13485

See exactly how MTCS (Singapore) controls map to ISO 13485. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
62%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

MTCS (Singapore) maps to ISO 13485 with 62% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 MTCS (Singapore) controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Tier 3 Additional Controls - MTCS SS 584.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Acquisition Development Supplier and Vulnerability - MTCS SS 584(3 mappings)

MTCS-Acquisition-Development-Maintenance-Supplier-Vulnerability-DevSecOps-SBOM-SDLC-SCA-API-ContainerMTCS Acquisition + Development + Maintenance + Supplier + Vulnerability + DevSecOps + SBOM + SDLC + SCA3 targets
→ISO13485-03Minimum necessary standard enforcement
→ISO13485-04Patient data de-identification procedures
→ISO13485-05Audit trail for ePHI access

Asset Management IAM and Cryptography - MTCS SS 584(3 mappings)

MTCS-Asset-IAM-Cryptography-Multi-Tier-Asset-Inventory-RBAC-MFA-PAM-FIPS-HSM-Quantum-SafeMTCS Asset Mgmt + IAM + Cryptography + Asset Inventory + RBAC + MFA + PAM + FIPS + HSM + Quantum-Safe3 targets
→6.4Logging and Monitoring
→ISO13485-01ePHI access controls and authorization
→ISO13485-12Unique user identification and authentication

Governance ISMS Risk HR and Lifecycle - MTCS SS 584(1 mappings)

MTCS-Governance-ISMS-Risk-HR-Lifecycle-Compliance-Cloud-Strategy-Roles-ResponsibilitiesMTCS Governance + ISMS + Risk Management + HR Security + Cloud Service Lifecycle + Compliance + Roles
→ISO13485-06Security management process and risk analysis

Logging Monitoring Compliance Audit and SLA - MTCS SS 584(1 mappings)

MTCS-Logging-Monitoring-Compliance-Audit-SLA-Configuration-SIEM-SOAR-Cloud-Monitoring-CSPMMTCS Logging + Monitoring + Compliance + Audit + SLA + Configuration + SIEM + SOAR + CSPM
→ISO13485-05Audit trail for ePHI access

Operations Physical and Network Security - MTCS SS 584(5 mappings)

MTCS-Operations-Physical-Network-Tier-III-Data-Centre-Hardening-Patching-Network-Segmentation-DDoSMTCS Operations + Physical + Network + Tier III Data Centre + Hardening + Patching + Segmentation + DDoS5 targets
→ISO13485-02ePHI encryption at rest and in transit
→ISO13485-03Minimum necessary standard enforcement
→ISO13485-04Patient data de-identification procedures
→ISO13485-05Audit trail for ePHI access
→ISO13485-16Transmission security and encryption

Related Comparisons

Other MTCS (Singapore) comparisons

MTCS (Singapore) vs ISO 270187 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs ISO 270177 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar7 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs Azure Security Benchmark7 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs Vietnam Law on Cybersecurity (No. 24/2018/QH14)6 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs Turkey KVKK6 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)6 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs Pakistan Personal Data Protection Bill 20236 mappings

Other ISO 13485 comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs ISO 1348516 mappingsNIST SP 800-66 vs ISO 1348513 mappingsMDS2 (Medical Device) vs ISO 1348513 mappingsMARS-E vs ISO 1348513 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs ISO 1348513 mappingsISO 27799 vs ISO 1348513 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs ISO 1348512 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs ISO 1348512 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between MTCS (Singapore) and ISO 13485?

MTCS (Singapore) has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO 13485 covers 44 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Tier 3 Additional Controls - MTCS SS 584, where 1 MTCS (Singapore) controls have no direct ISO 13485 equivalent.

How many controls map between MTCS (Singapore) and ISO 13485?

Of 8 total MTCS (Singapore) controls, 5 map directly to ISO 13485 controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping MTCS (Singapore) to ISO 13485?

3 MTCS (Singapore) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 13485. The highest concentration of gaps is in Tier 3 Additional Controls - MTCS SS 584 with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between MTCS (Singapore) and ISO 13485?

The domain with the highest gap count is Tier 3 Additional Controls - MTCS SS 584 (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.