TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)vsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
2
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 25% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Enforcement and 2024 Anti-Slavery Commissioner - Australia MSA 2018.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

Mandatory Criteria 1 and 2 - Identity and Structure - Australia MSA 2018(3 mappings)

AU-MSA-Mandatory-Criteria-1-2-Identity-Structure-Operations-Supply-Chain-Section-16-1a-16-1bAustralia MSA Mandatory Criteria 1 + 2 + Identity + Structure + Operations + Supply Chain + Section 16(1)(a) + (b)3 targets
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
→3.5Securely Dispose of Data

Mandatory Criterion 3 - Modern Slavery Risks - Australia MSA 2018(3 mappings)

AU-MSA-Mandatory-Criterion-3-Modern-Slavery-Risks-Operations-Supply-Chain-Section-16-1c-Sector-Geographic-IndicatorsAustralia MSA Mandatory Criterion 3 + Modern Slavery Risks + Section 16(1)(c) + Sector + Geographic Indicators3 targets
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
→3.5Securely Dispose of Data

Related Comparisons

Other Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) comparisons

Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) vs OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)3 mappingsModern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) vs APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management3 mappingsModern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) vs South Korea ISMS-P3 mappingsModern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers3 mappingsModern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) vs Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)3 mappingsModern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) vs ISO/IEC 27011:20243 mappingsModern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.03 mappingsModern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) vs OWASP Top 10:20252 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements18 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements17 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements17 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements16 mappingsISO 13485 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements16 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 706 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) has 8 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Enforcement and 2024 Anti-Slavery Commissioner - Australia MSA 2018, where 1 Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 8 total Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) controls, 2 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

6 Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Enforcement and 2024 Anti-Slavery Commissioner - Australia MSA 2018 with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Enforcement and 2024 Anti-Slavery Commissioner - Australia MSA 2018 (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.