TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

MITRE D3FENDvsISO/IEC 29147:2018

See exactly how MITRE D3FEND controls map to ISO/IEC 29147:2018. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

MITRE D3FEND maps to ISO/IEC 29147:2018 with 25% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 MITRE D3FEND controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Integration and Mapping - MITRE D3FEND.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

Harden Tactic - MITRE D3FEND(5 mappings)

MITRE-D3FEND-Harden-Tactic-Application-Credential-Message-Platform-Hardening-MFA-Encryption-Secure-BootMITRE D3FEND Harden Tactic + Application + Credential + Message + Platform + MFA + Encryption + Secure Boot5 targets
→29147-5.6Advisory Content and Quality
→29147-5.6Advisory Content and Quality
→29147-7.8Remediation information
→30111-1Scope
→30111-3Terms and definitions

Scope and Foundation - MITRE D3FEND(3 mappings)

MITRE-D3FEND-Scope-MITRE-NSA-2021-CC-BY-4-0-Countermeasure-Knowledge-Graph-Companion-ATTACK-OntologyMITRE D3FEND Scope + MITRE + NSA 2021 + CC BY 4.0 + Countermeasure Knowledge Graph + Companion to ATT&CK + Ontology3 targets
→29147-3Terms and definitions
→29147-9.2Contact mechanisms and scope
→30111-3Terms and definitions

Related Comparisons

Other MITRE D3FEND comparisons

MITRE D3FEND vs ISMAP (Japan)6 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs Azure Security Benchmark6 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs OWASP ASVS6 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs MITRE ATT&CK6 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar6 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers5 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems5 mappingsMITRE D3FEND vs ISO/IEC 27011:20245 mappings

Other ISO/IEC 29147:2018 comparisons

NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs ISO/IEC 29147:20188 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs ISO/IEC 29147:20187 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs ISO/IEC 29147:20187 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs ISO/IEC 29147:20187 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs ISO/IEC 29147:20187 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs ISO/IEC 29147:20187 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs ISO/IEC 29147:20187 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs ISO/IEC 29147:20187 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 706 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between MITRE D3FEND and ISO/IEC 29147:2018?

MITRE D3FEND has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 29147:2018 covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Integration and Mapping - MITRE D3FEND, where 1 MITRE D3FEND controls have no direct ISO/IEC 29147:2018 equivalent.

How many controls map between MITRE D3FEND and ISO/IEC 29147:2018?

Of 8 total MITRE D3FEND controls, 2 map directly to ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping MITRE D3FEND to ISO/IEC 29147:2018?

6 MITRE D3FEND controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 29147:2018. The highest concentration of gaps is in Integration and Mapping - MITRE D3FEND with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between MITRE D3FEND and ISO/IEC 29147:2018?

The domain with the highest gap count is Integration and Mapping - MITRE D3FEND (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.