Cross-Framework Mapping

Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy ActvsOWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023

See exactly how Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act controls map to OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
6
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act maps to OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023 with 25% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Enforcement Sanctions and Data Broker Registration - Minnesota CDPA.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Chief Privacy Officer Governance - Minnesota CDPA(1 mappings)

MN-CDPA-Chief-Privacy-Officer-Section-325O-06-MN-UNIQUE-Designation-Privacy-Programme-TrainingMinnesota CDPA Chief Privacy Officer + Section 325O.06 + MINNESOTA-UNIQUE Designation + Privacy Programme + Training
OWASPAPI-1Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA) and BFLA

Universal Opt-Out Sensitive and Health Data - Minnesota CDPA(1 mappings)

MN-CDPA-Universal-Opt-Out-GPC-Sensitive-Data-Section-325O-02-Consumer-Health-Data-Children-Known-Child-TransgenderMinnesota CDPA Universal Opt-Out + GPC + Sensitive + Section 325O.02 + Consumer Health Data + Children + Known Child + Transgender
OWASPAPI-6Security Misconfiguration and Secure API Design

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act and OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023?

Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act has 8 controls across its framework, while OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023 covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Enforcement Sanctions and Data Broker Registration - Minnesota CDPA, where 1 Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act controls have no direct OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023 equivalent.

How many controls map between Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act and OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023?

Of 8 total Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act controls, 2 map directly to OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023 controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act to OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023?

6 Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act controls have no direct equivalent in OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023. The highest concentration of gaps is in Enforcement Sanctions and Data Broker Registration - Minnesota CDPA with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Minnesota Consumer Data Privacy Act and OWASP API Security Top 10 - 2023?

The domain with the highest gap count is Enforcement Sanctions and Data Broker Registration - Minnesota CDPA (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.