TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024vsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems

See exactly how Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 controls map to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
6
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 maps to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems with 25% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Pseudonymisation and De-Identification - Maryland MODPA.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Enforcement and Remedies - Maryland MODPA(1 mappings)

MD-MODPA-Enforcement-Maryland-AG-Brown-CPD-Section-14-4613-10K-Per-Violation-Consumer-Protection-ActMaryland MODPA Enforcement + Maryland AG + CPD + Section 14-4613 + USD 10K Per Violation + Consumer Protection Act
→NISTSP34-1Contingency Planning Policy, Programme, and Plan Coordination

Data Minimization Sensitive and Health Data - Maryland MODPA(1 mappings)

MD-MODPA-Sensitive-Data-Health-Biometric-Section-14-4607-Reasonably-Necessary-Proportionate-Data-MinimizationMaryland MODPA Data Minimization + Sensitive + Health + Biometric + Section 14-4607 + Reasonably Necessary + Proportionate
→NISTSP34-3Preventive Controls and Recovery Strategies: Backup, Alternate Sites, Equipment

Related Comparisons

Other Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 comparisons

Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 vs Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on the Protection of Personal Data (UAE PDPL)5 mappingsMaryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 vs Turkey KVKK5 mappingsMaryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 vs Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)5 mappingsMaryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 vs Pakistan Personal Data Protection Bill 20235 mappingsMaryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 vs Bahrain PDPL5 mappingsMaryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 vs Azure Security Benchmark5 mappingsMaryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 vs Malaysia PDPA 20105 mappingsMaryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 vs South Korea PIPA5 mappings

Other NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems comparisons

AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems4 mappingsISO 20000-1 vs NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems4 mappingsIMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) vs NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems4 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems4 mappingsOWASP ASVS vs NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems4 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems4 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems4 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems4 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?

Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 has 8 controls across its framework, while NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Pseudonymisation and De-Identification - Maryland MODPA, where 1 Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 controls have no direct NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems equivalent.

How many controls map between Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?

Of 8 total Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 controls, 2 map directly to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?

6 Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems. The highest concentration of gaps is in Pseudonymisation and De-Identification - Maryland MODPA with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?

The domain with the highest gap count is Pseudonymisation and De-Identification - Maryland MODPA (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.