Cross-Framework Mapping

Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024vsSouth Korea PIPA

Name: Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 to South Korea PIPA Control Mapping Dataset
Creator: TheArtOfService

See exactly how Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 controls map to South Korea PIPA. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

Controls Mapped

Gaps Found

62%

Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 maps to South Korea PIPA with 62% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Universal Opt-Out Mechanism - Maryland MODPA.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Consumer Rights - Maryland MODPA(1 mappings)

MD-MODPA-Consumer-Rights-Section-14-4603-Access-Correction-Deletion-Portability-Opt-Out-AppealMaryland MODPA Consumer Rights + Section 14-4603 + Access + Correction + Deletion + Portability + Opt-Out + Appeal

→PIPA-Data-Subject-Rights-Access-Correction-Erasure-Portability-Automated-Decisions-Articles-35-37-2Korea PIPA Data Subject Rights + Access + Correction + Erasure + Portability + Article 35-37

Controller Duties and DPA - Maryland MODPA(5 mappings)

MD-MODPA-Controller-Duties-Security-DPA-Section-14-4608-14-4609-Processor-Contract-AssessmentMaryland MODPA Controller Duties + Section 14-4608 + Section 14-4609 + Processor Contract + DPA5 targets

→PIPA-CPO-DPO-Privacy-Officer-PIA-Personal-Information-Impact-Assessment-Articles-31-33Korea PIPA CPO + DPO + Privacy Officer + PIA + Personal Information Impact Assessment + Articles 31-33

→PIPA-Cross-Border-Transfer-Articles-28-8-28-9-Adequacy-Standard-Contract-Certification-EUKorea PIPA Cross-Border Transfer + Articles 28-8 + 28-9 + Adequacy + EU 2021

→PIPA-Data-Subject-Rights-Access-Correction-Erasure-Portability-Automated-Decisions-Articles-35-37-2Korea PIPA Data Subject Rights + Access + Correction + Erasure + Portability + Article 35-37

→PIPA-Pseudonymisation-Article-28-2-3-Enforcement-PIPC-Investigation-Surcharges-3-Percent-Revenue-Article64-2Korea PIPA Pseudonymisation + Article 28-2 + Enforcement + PIPC + Surcharges 3% + Article 63 + 64-2

→PIPA-Sensitive-Information-Unique-ID-Resident-Registration-Numbers-CCTV-Articles-23-24-25Korea PIPA Sensitive Information + Unique ID + RRN + CCTV + Articles 23-25

Enforcement and Remedies - Maryland MODPA(2 mappings)

MD-MODPA-Enforcement-Maryland-AG-Brown-CPD-Section-14-4613-10K-Per-Violation-Consumer-Protection-ActMaryland MODPA Enforcement + Maryland AG + CPD + Section 14-4613 + USD 10K Per Violation + Consumer Protection Act2 targets

→PIPA-Cross-Border-Transfer-Articles-28-8-28-9-Adequacy-Standard-Contract-Certification-EUKorea PIPA Cross-Border Transfer + Articles 28-8 + 28-9 + Adequacy + EU 2021

Pseudonymisation and De-Identification - Maryland MODPA(4 mappings)

MD-MODPA-Pseudonymisation-De-Identification-Section-14-4610-4611-Internal-Research-AggregatedMaryland MODPA Pseudonymisation + De-Identification + Section 14-4610 + 14-4611 + Internal Research + Aggregated4 targets

→PIPA-CPO-DPO-Privacy-Officer-PIA-Personal-Information-Impact-Assessment-Articles-31-33Korea PIPA CPO + DPO + Privacy Officer + PIA + Personal Information Impact Assessment + Articles 31-33

→PIPA-Cross-Border-Transfer-Articles-28-8-28-9-Adequacy-Standard-Contract-Certification-EUKorea PIPA Cross-Border Transfer + Articles 28-8 + 28-9 + Adequacy + EU 2021

→PIPA-Data-Subject-Rights-Access-Correction-Erasure-Portability-Automated-Decisions-Articles-35-37-2Korea PIPA Data Subject Rights + Access + Correction + Erasure + Portability + Article 35-37

Data Minimization Sensitive and Health Data - Maryland MODPA(3 mappings)

MD-MODPA-Sensitive-Data-Health-Biometric-Section-14-4607-Reasonably-Necessary-Proportionate-Data-MinimizationMaryland MODPA Data Minimization + Sensitive + Health + Biometric + Section 14-4607 + Reasonably Necessary + Proportionate3 targets

→PIPA-CPO-DPO-Privacy-Officer-PIA-Personal-Information-Impact-Assessment-Articles-31-33Korea PIPA CPO + DPO + Privacy Officer + PIA + Personal Information Impact Assessment + Articles 31-33

→PIPA-Cross-Border-Transfer-Articles-28-8-28-9-Adequacy-Standard-Contract-Certification-EUKorea PIPA Cross-Border Transfer + Articles 28-8 + 28-9 + Adequacy + EU 2021

→PIPA-Sensitive-Information-Unique-ID-Resident-Registration-Numbers-CCTV-Articles-23-24-25Korea PIPA Sensitive Information + Unique ID + RRN + CCTV + Articles 23-25

Related Comparisons

Other Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 comparisons

Other South Korea PIPA comparisons

Vietnam PDPD vs South Korea PIPA5 mappings Turkey KVKK vs South Korea PIPA5 mappings Privacy Act 2020 vs South Korea PIPA5 mappings Privacy Act 1988 (Australia) vs South Korea PIPA5 mappings Peru DPL vs South Korea PIPA5 mappings Personal Data Act (personopplysningsloven) vs South Korea PIPA5 mappings PDPA Thailand vs South Korea PIPA5 mappings PDPA Singapore vs South Korea PIPA5 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

✓ 718 framework browser
✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
✓ 824 compliance assessments
✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day

Get Started Free

Recommended

$49/month

Professional

✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
✓ Unlimited full-text search
✓ Framework self-assessment
✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports

Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53 ISO 27001 vs NIST CSF CMMC vs NIST 800-53 FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53 NIST CSF vs SOC 2 HIPAA vs NIST 800-53 ISO 27001 vs SOC 2 ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 and South Korea PIPA?

Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 has 8 controls across its framework, while South Korea PIPA covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Universal Opt-Out Mechanism - Maryland MODPA, where 1 Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 controls have no direct South Korea PIPA equivalent.

How many controls map between Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 and South Korea PIPA?

Of 8 total Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 controls, 5 map directly to South Korea PIPA controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 to South Korea PIPA?

3 Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 controls have no direct equivalent in South Korea PIPA. The highest concentration of gaps is in Universal Opt-Out Mechanism - Maryland MODPA with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Maryland Online Data Privacy Act of 2024 and South Korea PIPA?

The domain with the highest gap count is Universal Opt-Out Mechanism - Maryland MODPA (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.