Cross-Framework Mapping

MARS-EvsISO 27005

See exactly how MARS-E controls map to ISO 27005. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
2
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

MARS-E maps to ISO 27005 with 50% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 MARS-E controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Audit Accountability and Continuous Monitoring - MARS-E v2.0.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Contingency Media Protection System Integrity - MARS-E v2.0(1 mappings)

MARS-E-Contingency-Media-Protection-System-Integrity-CP-MP-SI-Families-DR-COOP-Encryption-SanitizationMARS-E Contingency + Media Protection + System Integrity + CP + MP + SI Families + DR + COOP
9.1Risk communication and consultation

Cross-Program Coordination - MARS-E v2.0(1 mappings)

MARS-E-Cross-Program-Coordination-IRS-Pub-1075-FedRAMP-CMS-ARS-HHS-OIG-Joint-Audit-3PAOMARS-E Cross-Program + IRS Pub 1075 + FedRAMP + CMS ARS + HHS OIG + Joint Audit + 3PAO
9.1Risk communication and consultation

Incident Response and Breach Notification - MARS-E v2.0(1 mappings)

MARS-E-Incident-Response-Breach-Notification-IR-Family-45-CFR-164-400-414-IRS-Pub-1075-Notification-CMS-IRTMARS-E Incident Response + Breach Notification + IR Family + 45 CFR 164.400-414 + IRS Pub 1075 + CMS IRT
9.1Risk communication and consultation

Security Control Catalog NIST 800-53 Moderate Baseline - MARS-E v2.0(3 mappings)

MARS-E-NIST-800-53-Moderate-Baseline-Catalog-v2-0-Volume-III-Tailoring-Risk-Assessment-CategorizationMARS-E NIST 800-53 Moderate Baseline + MARS-E Catalog Volume III + Tailoring + Risk Assessment + Categorization3 targets
ISO27005-06Risk identification methods
ISO27005-08Risk criteria and thresholds
ISO27005-10Risk interdependency analysis

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between MARS-E and ISO 27005?

MARS-E has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO 27005 covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Audit Accountability and Continuous Monitoring - MARS-E v2.0, where 1 MARS-E controls have no direct ISO 27005 equivalent.

How many controls map between MARS-E and ISO 27005?

Of 8 total MARS-E controls, 4 map directly to ISO 27005 controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping MARS-E to ISO 27005?

4 MARS-E controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27005. The highest concentration of gaps is in Audit Accountability and Continuous Monitoring - MARS-E v2.0 with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between MARS-E and ISO 27005?

The domain with the highest gap count is Audit Accountability and Continuous Monitoring - MARS-E v2.0 (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.