LGPDvsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems
See exactly how LGPD controls map to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
LGPD maps to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems with 25% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 LGPD controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cross-Border + Article 33-36 + Mercosur + RIPD.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.
Enforcement + Sanctions + ANPD + 2% Turnover(1 mappings)
Security + Article 46 + Breach Article 48 + ANPD 3 days(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other LGPD comparisons
Other NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 706 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between LGPD and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?
LGPD has 8 controls across its framework, while NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cross-Border + Article 33-36 + Mercosur + RIPD, where 1 LGPD controls have no direct NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems equivalent.
How many controls map between LGPD and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?
Of 8 total LGPD controls, 2 map directly to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping LGPD to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?
6 LGPD controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems. The highest concentration of gaps is in Cross-Border + Article 33-36 + Mercosur + RIPD with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between LGPD and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?
The domain with the highest gap count is Cross-Border + Article 33-36 + Mercosur + RIPD (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.