Cross-Framework Mapping

LGPDvsSouth Korea PIPA

See exactly how LGPD controls map to South Korea PIPA. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
62%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

LGPD maps to South Korea PIPA with 62% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 LGPD controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Sensitive Data + Article 11 + Children Article 14 + Public Sector.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Cross-Border + Article 33-36 + Mercosur + RIPD(3 mappings)

LGPD-BR-Cross-Border-International-Transfer-Article-33-Adequacy-SCC-BCR-ANPD-Approval-Mercosur-RIPDBrazil LGPD Cross-Border + Article 33 + Adequacy + SCC + BCR + Mercosur + RIPD3 targets
PIPA-CPO-DPO-Privacy-Officer-PIA-Personal-Information-Impact-Assessment-Articles-31-33Korea PIPA CPO + DPO + Privacy Officer + PIA + Personal Information Impact Assessment + Articles 31-33
PIPA-Cross-Border-Transfer-Articles-28-8-28-9-Adequacy-Standard-Contract-Certification-EUKorea PIPA Cross-Border Transfer + Articles 28-8 + 28-9 + Adequacy + EU 2021
PIPA-Pseudonymisation-Article-28-2-3-Enforcement-PIPC-Investigation-Surcharges-3-Percent-Revenue-Article64-2Korea PIPA Pseudonymisation + Article 28-2 + Enforcement + PIPC + Surcharges 3% + Article 63 + 64-2

Subject Rights + Article 18 + 9 Rights + Article 20 Automated Review(1 mappings)

LGPD-BR-Data-Subject-Rights-Article-18-Confirmation-Access-Correction-Anonymization-Portability-Revoke-SharingBrazil LGPD Data Subject Rights + Article 18 + 9 Rights + Confirmation + Anonymization
PIPA-Data-Subject-Rights-Access-Correction-Erasure-Portability-Automated-Decisions-Articles-35-37-2Korea PIPA Data Subject Rights + Access + Correction + Erasure + Portability + Article 35-37

Enforcement + Sanctions + ANPD + 2% Turnover(1 mappings)

LGPD-BR-Enforcement-Sanctions-ANPD-Article-52-55-Administrative-Sanctions-2-Percent-Turnover-50M-BRLBrazil LGPD Enforcement + Sanctions + Article 52 + 2% Turnover + 50M BRL + ANPD
PIPA-Pseudonymisation-Article-28-2-3-Enforcement-PIPC-Investigation-Surcharges-3-Percent-Revenue-Article64-2Korea PIPA Pseudonymisation + Article 28-2 + Enforcement + PIPC + Surcharges 3% + Article 63 + 64-2

Governance + Encarregado + ROPA + DPIA + Articles 46-50(3 mappings)

LGPD-BR-Governance-Encarregado-DPO-ROPA-DPIA-Privacy-by-Design-Article-46-50-Codes-of-ConductBrazil LGPD Governance + Encarregado (DPO) + ROPA + DPIA + Articles 46-503 targets
PIPA-CPO-DPO-Privacy-Officer-PIA-Personal-Information-Impact-Assessment-Articles-31-33Korea PIPA CPO + DPO + Privacy Officer + PIA + Personal Information Impact Assessment + Articles 31-33
PIPA-Cross-Border-Transfer-Articles-28-8-28-9-Adequacy-Standard-Contract-Certification-EUKorea PIPA Cross-Border Transfer + Articles 28-8 + 28-9 + Adequacy + EU 2021
PIPA-Pseudonymisation-Article-28-2-3-Enforcement-PIPC-Investigation-Surcharges-3-Percent-Revenue-Article64-2Korea PIPA Pseudonymisation + Article 28-2 + Enforcement + PIPC + Surcharges 3% + Article 63 + 64-2

Security + Article 46 + Breach Article 48 + ANPD 3 days(4 mappings)

LGPD-BR-Security-Article-46-48-Breach-Notification-ANPD-Reasonable-Time-Incident-Response-CSIRTBrazil LGPD Security + Article 46-48 + Breach Notification + ANPD + Incident Response4 targets
PIPA-CPO-DPO-Privacy-Officer-PIA-Personal-Information-Impact-Assessment-Articles-31-33Korea PIPA CPO + DPO + Privacy Officer + PIA + Personal Information Impact Assessment + Articles 31-33
PIPA-Cross-Border-Transfer-Articles-28-8-28-9-Adequacy-Standard-Contract-Certification-EUKorea PIPA Cross-Border Transfer + Articles 28-8 + 28-9 + Adequacy + EU 2021
PIPA-Data-Subject-Rights-Access-Correction-Erasure-Portability-Automated-Decisions-Articles-35-37-2Korea PIPA Data Subject Rights + Access + Correction + Erasure + Portability + Article 35-37
PIPA-Sensitive-Information-Unique-ID-Resident-Registration-Numbers-CCTV-Articles-23-24-25Korea PIPA Sensitive Information + Unique ID + RRN + CCTV + Articles 23-25

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between LGPD and South Korea PIPA?

LGPD has 8 controls across its framework, while South Korea PIPA covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Sensitive Data + Article 11 + Children Article 14 + Public Sector, where 1 LGPD controls have no direct South Korea PIPA equivalent.

How many controls map between LGPD and South Korea PIPA?

Of 8 total LGPD controls, 5 map directly to South Korea PIPA controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping LGPD to South Korea PIPA?

3 LGPD controls have no direct equivalent in South Korea PIPA. The highest concentration of gaps is in Sensitive Data + Article 11 + Children Article 14 + Public Sector with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between LGPD and South Korea PIPA?

The domain with the highest gap count is Sensitive Data + Article 11 + Children Article 14 + Public Sector (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.