TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal DatavsAfrican Union Malabo Convention

See exactly how Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data controls map to African Union Malabo Convention. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

53
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
29%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data maps to African Union Malabo Convention with 29% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 49 Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data controls identifies 35 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Colombia Habeas Data Law: Data Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 49 controls analysed | 768 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 53 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 768 frameworks.

Lawful Basis(3 mappings)

Art.10Cases When Authorization Is Not Required3 targets
→Art. 2Consent Definition
→Art. 4Participating Institutions
→Art. 8Compliance with the Requirements

Supervisory Authority(2 mappings)

Art.19Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio Functions
→Art. 27Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment for High-Risk AI Systems
Art.21Functions of the SIC Specific to Personal Data
→Art. 28Notifying Authorities

International Transfers(1 mappings)

Art.26Production Orders
→Art. 27Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment for High-Risk AI Systems

Special Categories(14 mappings)

Art.6Processing of Sensitive Data7 targets
→Art. 12Record-Keeping
→Art. 19Automatically Generated Logs
→Art. 26Obligations of Deployers of High-Risk AI Systems
→Art. 29Application of a Conformity Assessment Body for Notification
→Art. 30Privacy Policy
→Art. 34Notification of Personal Information Breach
→Art. 8Compliance with the Requirements
Art.7Children's Data7 targets
→Art. 12Record-Keeping
→Art. 19Automatically Generated Logs
→Art. 26Obligations of Deployers of High-Risk AI Systems
→Art. 29Application of a Conformity Assessment Body for Notification
→Art. 30Privacy Policy
→Art. 34Notification of Personal Information Breach
→Art. 8Compliance with the Requirements

+33 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 768 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data comparisons

Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data vs LGPD20 mappingsLaw 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data vs South Korea PIPA20 mappingsLaw 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data vs Argentina PDPA19 mappingsLaw 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data vs Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)19 mappingsLaw 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data vs Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)19 mappingsLaw 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data vs APPI19 mappingsLaw 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data vs Switzerland FADP19 mappingsLaw 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data vs Texas Data Privacy Act19 mappings

Other African Union Malabo Convention comparisons

EU AI Act vs African Union Malabo Convention16 mappingsBS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience vs African Union Malabo Convention15 mappingsILO Nursing Personnel Convention C149 (1977) vs African Union Malabo Convention14 mappings6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673) vs African Union Malabo Convention14 mappingsISO 8000 — Data Quality vs African Union Malabo Convention14 mappingsFATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule vs African Union Malabo Convention14 mappingsPrivacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles vs African Union Malabo Convention14 mappingsTurkey Personal Data Protection Law (KVKK — Law No. 6698) vs African Union Malabo Convention14 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 768 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 768 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data and African Union Malabo Convention?

Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data has 49 controls across its framework, while African Union Malabo Convention covers 51 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (29% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Colombia Habeas Data Law: Data Security, where 6 Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data controls have no direct African Union Malabo Convention equivalent.

How many controls map between Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data and African Union Malabo Convention?

Of 49 total Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data controls, 14 map directly to African Union Malabo Convention controls — representing 29% coverage. The remaining 35 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data to African Union Malabo Convention?

35 Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data controls have no direct equivalent in African Union Malabo Convention. The highest concentration of gaps is in Colombia Habeas Data Law: Data Security with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data and African Union Malabo Convention?

The domain with the highest gap count is Colombia Habeas Data Law: Data Security (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.