TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal DatavsChile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)

See exactly how Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data controls map to Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

50
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
39%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data maps to Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) with 39% coverage across 19 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 49 Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data controls identifies 30 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Colombia Habeas Data Law: Accountability & Compliance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 49 controls analysed | 768 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 50 mapped controls across 10 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 768 frameworks.

Lawful Basis(3 mappings)

Art.10Cases When Authorization Is Not Required3 targets
→Art. 15 bisProcessor Obligations
→Art. 2Consent Definition
→Art. 8Compliance with the Requirements

Transparency(1 mappings)

Art.12Prohibition of Illegal Interception
→Art. 14 sexiesBreach Notification

Supervisory Authority(2 mappings)

Art.19Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio Functions
→Art. 27Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment for High-Risk AI Systems
Art.21Functions of the SIC Specific to Personal Data
→Art. 28Notifying Authorities

Registry(1 mappings)

Art.25Preservation of Stored Data
→Art. 15 terData Protection Impact Assessment

International Transfers(1 mappings)

Art.26Production Orders
→Art. 27Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment for High-Risk AI Systems

Special Categories(10 mappings)

Art.6Processing of Sensitive Data5 targets
→Art. 12Record-Keeping
→Art. 30Privacy Policy
→Art. 35Right of Access
→Art. 49Collective Dispute Resolution
→Art. 8Compliance with the Requirements
Art.7Children's Data5 targets
→Art. 12Record-Keeping
→Art. 30Privacy Policy
→Art. 35Right of Access
→Art. 49Collective Dispute Resolution
→Art. 8Compliance with the Requirements

Rights(2 mappings)

Art.8Rights of Data Subjects2 targets
→Art. 15 bisProcessor Obligations
→Art. 2Consent Definition

+30 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 768 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data comparisons

Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data vs LGPD20 mappingsLaw 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data vs South Korea PIPA20 mappingsLaw 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data vs Argentina PDPA19 mappingsLaw 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data vs Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)19 mappingsLaw 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data vs APPI19 mappingsLaw 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data vs Switzerland FADP19 mappingsLaw 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data vs Texas Data Privacy Act19 mappingsLaw 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data vs Iceland DPA19 mappings

Other Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) comparisons

Turkey Personal Data Protection Law (KVKK — Law No. 6698) vs Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)15 mappingsLGPD vs Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)15 mappingsEU AI Act vs Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)14 mappingsSerbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) vs Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)14 mappingsGDPR vs Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)14 mappingsArgentina PDPA vs Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)14 mappingsAPPI vs Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)14 mappingsPakistan Personal Data Protection Bill 2023 vs Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)14 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 768 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 768 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data and Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)?

Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data has 49 controls across its framework, while Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) covers 52 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 19 overlapping controls (39% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Colombia Habeas Data Law: Accountability & Compliance, where 5 Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data controls have no direct Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) equivalent.

How many controls map between Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data and Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)?

Of 49 total Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data controls, 19 map directly to Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719) controls — representing 39% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data to Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)?

30 Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data controls have no direct equivalent in Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719). The highest concentration of gaps is in Colombia Habeas Data Law: Accountability & Compliance with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Law 1581 of 2012 - Statutory Framework for the Protection of Personal Data and Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Colombia Habeas Data Law: Accountability & Compliance (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.