EU AI ActvsAfrican Union Malabo Convention
See exactly how EU AI Act controls map to African Union Malabo Convention. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
EU AI Act maps to African Union Malabo Convention with 38% coverage across 20 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 53 EU AI Act controls identifies 33 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in High-risk AI.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 53 controls analysed | 768 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 68 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 768 frameworks.
High-risk AI(20 mappings)
+48 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 768 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other EU AI Act comparisons
Other African Union Malabo Convention comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 768 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 768 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between EU AI Act and African Union Malabo Convention?
EU AI Act has 53 controls across its framework, while African Union Malabo Convention covers 51 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 20 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in High-risk AI, where 10 EU AI Act controls have no direct African Union Malabo Convention equivalent.
How many controls map between EU AI Act and African Union Malabo Convention?
Of 53 total EU AI Act controls, 20 map directly to African Union Malabo Convention controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 33 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping EU AI Act to African Union Malabo Convention?
33 EU AI Act controls have no direct equivalent in African Union Malabo Convention. The highest concentration of gaps is in High-risk AI with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between EU AI Act and African Union Malabo Convention?
The domain with the highest gap count is High-risk AI (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.