TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial InstitutionsvsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
7
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 18% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 11 Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls identifies 9 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in JP FSA Cyber BCM + Resilience.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 11 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

JP FSA Cyber Incident Response(3 mappings)

JP-FSA-CYB-Incident-Response-Playbooks-Containment-Eradication-Recovery-Post-Mortem-Tabletop-CSIRTJapan FSA Cybersecurity Incident Response + Playbooks + Containment + Eradication + Recovery + Post-Mortem + Tabletop Exercises + CSIRT + FSA Notification + Customer Communication + Forensics + Lessons Learned3 targets
→3.6Encrypt Data on End-User Devices
→3.6.1Incident Response Capability
→FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup

JP FSA Cyber SOC + Detection(1 mappings)

JP-FSA-CYB-Security-Monitoring-SOC-Operations-SIEM-EDR-MDR-XDR-24x7-Detection-Alert-TriageJapan FSA Cybersecurity Security Monitoring + SOC 24x7 Operations + SIEM + EDR + MDR + XDR + Detection + Alert Triage + Threat Hunting + Incident Response Integration + Threat Intelligence Integration + UEBA
→3.12Segment Data Processing and Storage Based on Sensitivity

Related Comparisons

Other Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions comparisons

Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) - Higher Education Safeguards Rule3 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)3 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs Azure Security Benchmark3 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs ISO 270173 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)3 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar3 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs ISO 270183 mappingsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions vs ISO/IEC 27011:20243 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements18 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements17 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements16 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions has 11 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in JP FSA Cyber BCM + Resilience, where 1 Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 11 total Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls, 2 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 9 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

9 Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in JP FSA Cyber BCM + Resilience with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is JP FSA Cyber BCM + Resilience (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.