ITAR - International Traffic in Arms RegulationsvsISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories
See exactly how ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations controls map to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations maps to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories with 50% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ITAR Parts 129-130 Brokering + Political.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
ITAR Compliance Program + Coord(3 mappings)
ITAR Parts 123-125 Export Licensing(1 mappings)
ITAR Scope + AECA + DDTC + USML(3 mappings)
ITAR Technical Data + Defense Services(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?
ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories covers 90 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ITAR Parts 129-130 Brokering + Political, where 1 ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations controls have no direct ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories equivalent.
How many controls map between ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?
Of 8 total ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations controls, 4 map directly to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?
4 ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories. The highest concentration of gaps is in ITAR Parts 129-130 Brokering + Political with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?
The domain with the highest gap count is ITAR Parts 129-130 Brokering + Political (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.