ITAR - International Traffic in Arms RegulationsvsISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement
See exactly how ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations controls map to ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations maps to ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement with 25% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ITAR Parts 129-130 Brokering + Political.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
ITAR Compliance Program + Coord(1 mappings)
ITAR Scope + AECA + DDTC + USML(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations comparisons
Other ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations and ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement?
ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ITAR Parts 129-130 Brokering + Political, where 1 ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations controls have no direct ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement equivalent.
How many controls map between ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations and ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement?
Of 8 total ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations controls, 2 map directly to ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations to ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement?
6 ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement. The highest concentration of gaps is in ITAR Parts 129-130 Brokering + Political with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ITAR - International Traffic in Arms Regulations and ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement?
The domain with the highest gap count is ITAR Parts 129-130 Brokering + Political (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.