Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/SAE 21434vsITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications

See exactly how ISO/SAE 21434 controls map to ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
46
Gaps Found
8%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/SAE 21434 maps to ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications with 8% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 50 ISO/SAE 21434 controls identifies 46 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISO/SAE 21434: Operations Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 50 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

ISO/SAE 21434: Access Control(4 mappings)

ISO21434-12User access management and provisioning
X805-Dim1-Access-Control-RBAC-Authorization-Resources-Network-Elements-Services-ApplicationsITU-T X.805 Security Dimension 1 - Access Control + Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) + Authorization + Resources + Network Elements + Services + Applications + Access Limitations + Authorized Personnel + Discretionary + Mandatory Access Control
ISO21434-13Authentication and password management
X805-Dim2-Authentication-Identity-Verification-Claimed-Identities-Entities-CommunicationITU-T X.805 Security Dimension 2 - Authentication + Identity Verification + Claimed Identity + Entity Authentication + Data Origin Authentication + Mutual Authentication + Multi-Factor + Cryptographic Authentication
ISO21434-14Privileged access management
X805-Dim1-Access-Control-RBAC-Authorization-Resources-Network-Elements-Services-ApplicationsITU-T X.805 Security Dimension 1 - Access Control + Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) + Authorization + Resources + Network Elements + Services + Applications + Access Limitations + Authorized Personnel + Discretionary + Mandatory Access Control
ISO21434-15Access review and recertification
X805-Dim1-Access-Control-RBAC-Authorization-Resources-Network-Elements-Services-ApplicationsITU-T X.805 Security Dimension 1 - Access Control + Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) + Authorization + Resources + Network Elements + Services + Applications + Access Limitations + Authorized Personnel + Discretionary + Mandatory Access Control

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 706 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/SAE 21434 and ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications?

ISO/SAE 21434 has 50 controls across its framework, while ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications covers 13 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISO/SAE 21434: Operations Security, where 6 ISO/SAE 21434 controls have no direct ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/SAE 21434 and ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications?

Of 50 total ISO/SAE 21434 controls, 4 map directly to ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 46 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/SAE 21434 to ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications?

46 ISO/SAE 21434 controls have no direct equivalent in ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications. The highest concentration of gaps is in ISO/SAE 21434: Operations Security with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/SAE 21434 and ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications?

The domain with the highest gap count is ISO/SAE 21434: Operations Security (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.