ISO/IEC 42001:2023vsNSW AI Operational Policy (2026)
See exactly how ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls map to NSW AI Operational Policy (2026). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 maps to NSW AI Operational Policy (2026) with 21% coverage across 18 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 38 ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls identifies 70 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Clause A – ISO/IEC 42001:2023.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 38 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 22 mapped controls across 13 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.
Improvement – ISO/IEC 42001:2023(1 mappings)
Context of the organization – ISO/IEC 42001:2023(1 mappings)
Leadership – ISO/IEC 42001:2023(3 mappings)
Planning – ISO/IEC 42001:2023(1 mappings)
Support – ISO/IEC 42001:2023(1 mappings)
Operation – ISO/IEC 42001:2023(2 mappings)
Performance evaluation – ISO/IEC 42001:2023(2 mappings)
Annex A AIMS controls - A.10 Third-party and customer relationships(1 mappings)
Annex A AIMS controls - A.2 Policies related to AI(2 mappings)
Annex A AIMS controls - A.3 Internal organization(4 mappings)
Annex A AIMS controls - A.6 AI system life cycle(1 mappings)
Annex A AIMS controls - A.8 Information for interested parties of AI systems(1 mappings)
+2 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 868 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
A ISO/IEC 42001:2023 to NSW AI Operational Policy (2026) crosswalk, built to order
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NSW AI Operational Policy (2026) controls your existing ISO/IEC 42001:2023 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 21% in the header counts how many ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NSW AI Operational Policy (2026) controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 42001:2023 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 868 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and NSW AI Operational Policy (2026)?
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 has 38 controls across its framework, while NSW AI Operational Policy (2026) covers 46 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 18 overlapping controls (21% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause A – ISO/IEC 42001:2023, where 9 ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls have no direct NSW AI Operational Policy (2026) equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and NSW AI Operational Policy (2026)?
Of 38 total ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls, 18 map directly to NSW AI Operational Policy (2026) controls, representing 21% coverage. The remaining 70 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 42001:2023 to NSW AI Operational Policy (2026)?
70 ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls have no direct equivalent in NSW AI Operational Policy (2026). The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause A – ISO/IEC 42001:2023 with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and NSW AI Operational Policy (2026)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Clause A – ISO/IEC 42001:2023 (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.