Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 42001:2023vsNIST SP 800-66 Rev 2

See exactly how ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls map to NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
31
Gaps Found
5%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 maps to NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 with 5% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 38 ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls identifies 76 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Clause A – ISO/IEC 42001:2023.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 38 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Leadership – ISO/IEC 42001:2023(1 mappings)

iso-iec-42001-2023::5.3Roles, responsibilities and authorities
164.308(a)(2)Assigned Security Responsibility (Standard)

Support – ISO/IEC 42001:2023(2 mappings)

iso-iec-42001-2023::7.5Documented information
164.316(b)(1)Documentation (Standard)
iso-iec-42001-2023::7.5.3Control of documented information
164.316(b)(1)Documentation (Standard)

Operation – ISO/IEC 42001:2023(1 mappings)

iso-iec-42001-2023::8.3AI risk treatment
164.308(a)(1)(ii)(B)Risk Management (Required)

Performance evaluation – ISO/IEC 42001:2023(1 mappings)

iso-iec-42001-2023::9.2Internal audit
164.308(a)(8)Evaluation (Standard)

Annex A AIMS controls - A.10 Third-party and customer relationships(1 mappings)

iso-iec-42001-2023::A.10.3Suppliers
164.308(b)(1)Business Associate Contracts and Other Arrangements (Standard)

Annex A AIMS controls - A.3 Internal organization(1 mappings)

iso-iec-42001-2023::A.3.2AI roles and responsibilities
164.308(a)(2)Assigned Security Responsibility (Standard)
Coverage crosswalk

A ISO/IEC 42001:2023 to NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 controls your existing ISO/IEC 42001:2023 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 into NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 into ISO/IEC 42001:2023
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 to NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 5% in the header counts how many ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2?

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 has 38 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 covers 65 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (5% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause A – ISO/IEC 42001:2023, where 9 ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2?

Of 38 total ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls, 7 map directly to NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2 controls, representing 5% coverage. The remaining 76 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 42001:2023 to NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2?

76 ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause A – ISO/IEC 42001:2023 with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and NIST SP 800-66 Rev 2?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause A – ISO/IEC 42001:2023 (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.