ISO/IEC 42001:2023vsAustralia National Framework for the Assurance of AI in Government (2024)
See exactly how ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls map to Australia National Framework for the Assurance of AI in Government (2024). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 maps to Australia National Framework for the Assurance of AI in Government (2024) with 26% coverage across 17 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 38 ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls identifies 71 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Clause A – ISO/IEC 42001:2023.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 38 controls analysed | 849 frameworks | 314K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 10 domains. Sign up to explore all 314K+ mappings across 849 frameworks.
Context of the organization – ISO/IEC 42001:2023(2 mappings)
Leadership – ISO/IEC 42001:2023(1 mappings)
Planning – ISO/IEC 42001:2023(1 mappings)
Support – ISO/IEC 42001:2023(3 mappings)
Annex A AIMS controls - A.10 Third-party and customer relationships(1 mappings)
Annex A AIMS controls - A.3 Internal organization(2 mappings)
Annex A AIMS controls - A.5 Assessing impacts of AI systems(3 mappings)
Annex A AIMS controls - A.6 AI system life cycle(3 mappings)
Annex A AIMS controls - A.7 Data for AI systems(3 mappings)
Annex A AIMS controls - A.8 Information for interested parties of AI systems(1 mappings)
A ISO/IEC 42001:2023 to Australia National Framework for the Assurance of AI in Government (2024) crosswalk, built to order
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which Australia National Framework for the Assurance of AI in Government (2024) controls your existing ISO/IEC 42001:2023 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 26% in the header counts how many ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many Australia National Framework for the Assurance of AI in Government (2024) controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 42001:2023 comparisons
Other Australia National Framework for the Assurance of AI in Government (2024) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
Cross-framework mappings across 849 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 849 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (314K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and Australia National Framework for the Assurance of AI in Government (2024)?
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 has 38 controls across its framework, while Australia National Framework for the Assurance of AI in Government (2024) covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 17 overlapping controls (26% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause A – ISO/IEC 42001:2023, where 9 ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls have no direct Australia National Framework for the Assurance of AI in Government (2024) equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and Australia National Framework for the Assurance of AI in Government (2024)?
Of 38 total ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls, 17 map directly to Australia National Framework for the Assurance of AI in Government (2024) controls, representing 26% coverage. The remaining 71 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 42001:2023 to Australia National Framework for the Assurance of AI in Government (2024)?
71 ISO/IEC 42001:2023 controls have no direct equivalent in Australia National Framework for the Assurance of AI in Government (2024). The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause A – ISO/IEC 42001:2023 with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and Australia National Framework for the Assurance of AI in Government (2024)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Clause A – ISO/IEC 42001:2023 (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.