TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 29147:2018vsFCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011)

See exactly how ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls map to FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
34
Gaps Found
8%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 29147:2018 maps to FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011) with 8% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 40 ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls identifies 45 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 5: Vulnerability Disclosure Concepts.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 40 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Clause 1-4: Introduction(4 mappings)

29147-3Terms and definitions2 targets
→CPNI-64.2001_2003Basis, purpose and definitions (47 CFR 64.2001 + 64.2003)
→CPNI-64.2011Notification of CPNI security breaches (47 CFR 64.2011)
30111-3Terms and definitions2 targets
→CPNI-64.2001_2003Basis, purpose and definitions (47 CFR 64.2001 + 64.2003)
→CPNI-64.2011Notification of CPNI security breaches (47 CFR 64.2011)

Clause 8-9: Coordination and Disclosure Policy(2 mappings)

29147-9.2Contact mechanisms and scope2 targets
→CPNI-64.2001_2003Basis, purpose and definitions (47 CFR 64.2001 + 64.2003)
→CPNI-64.2011Notification of CPNI security breaches (47 CFR 64.2011)

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 29147:2018 comparisons

ISO/IEC 29147:2018 vs NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)8 mappingsISO/IEC 29147:2018 vs NIST SP 800-1467 mappingsISO/IEC 29147:2018 vs NIST SP 800-1457 mappingsISO/IEC 29147:2018 vs NIST SP 800-1447 mappingsISO/IEC 29147:2018 vs MTCS (Singapore)7 mappingsISO/IEC 29147:2018 vs ISMAP (Japan)7 mappingsISO/IEC 29147:2018 vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)7 mappingsISO/IEC 29147:2018 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)7 mappings

Other FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011) comparisons

ISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011)5 mappingsISO 19011 vs FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011)5 mappingsISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence vs FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011)5 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011)4 mappingsSWIFT CSCF vs FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011)3 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011)3 mappingsISO/IEC 29115:2023 - Entity Authentication Assurance Framework vs FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011)3 mappingsISO/IEC 23837 - Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution vs FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011)3 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 29147:2018 and FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011)?

ISO/IEC 29147:2018 has 40 controls across its framework, while FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011) covers 13 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 5: Vulnerability Disclosure Concepts, where 8 ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls have no direct FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 29147:2018 and FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011)?

Of 40 total ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls, 3 map directly to FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011) controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 45 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 29147:2018 to FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011)?

45 ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls have no direct equivalent in FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011). The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 5: Vulnerability Disclosure Concepts with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 29147:2018 and FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 5: Vulnerability Disclosure Concepts (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.