TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and CompetencevsFCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011)

See exactly how ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence controls map to FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
81
Gaps Found
4%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence maps to FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011) with 4% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 89 ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence controls identifies 74 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 7: Process Requirements.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 89 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

Resource Requirements(8 mappings)

6.4Logging and Monitoring
→CPNI-64.2010Safeguards on disclosure - authentication for account access (47 CFR 64.2010)
6.5Preparing and Distributing Audit Report5 targets
→CPNI-64.2001_2003Basis, purpose and definitions (47 CFR 64.2001 + 64.2003)
→CPNI-64.2004Customer approval mechanisms - opt-in and opt-out (47 CFR 64.2004)
→CPNI-64.2010Safeguards on disclosure - authentication for account access (47 CFR 64.2010)
→CPNI-64.2011Notification of CPNI security breaches (47 CFR 64.2011)
→CPNI-AnnualCertAnnual compliance certification - 1 March deadline (47 CFR 64.2009(e))
6.7Conducting Audit Follow-up2 targets
→CPNI-64.2001_2003Basis, purpose and definitions (47 CFR 64.2001 + 64.2003)
→CPNI-64.2011Notification of CPNI security breaches (47 CFR 64.2011)

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence comparisons

ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence vs PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products20 mappingsISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence vs ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories19 mappingsISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence vs AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System18 mappingsISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence vs ISO/IEC 27003:201718 mappingsISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence vs AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence18 mappingsISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence vs BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 917 mappingsISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence vs IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes16 mappings

Other FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011) comparisons

ISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011)5 mappingsISO 19011 vs FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011)5 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011)4 mappingsSWIFT CSCF vs FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011)3 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011)3 mappingsISO/IEC 29115:2023 - Entity Authentication Assurance Framework vs FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011)3 mappingsISO/IEC 23837 - Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution vs FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011)3 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011)2 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 706 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence and FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011)?

ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence has 89 controls across its framework, while FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011) covers 13 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (4% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 7: Process Requirements, where 19 ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence controls have no direct FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence and FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011)?

Of 89 total ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence controls, 3 map directly to FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011) controls — representing 4% coverage. The remaining 74 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence to FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011)?

74 ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence controls have no direct equivalent in FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011). The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 7: Process Requirements with 19 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence and FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 7: Process Requirements (19 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.